 fredjaz (108), Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Oct 22, 2007 If you have to drink light beer this is not a bad choice. More flavor than any of the american lights. But, in the end it is what it is, a light beer. Existing only to intoxicate with less guilt.
beerlover79 (35), st. catharines, Ontario, Canada
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Oct 17, 2007 i love labatt but tthis beer sucks for a light beer, watery, weak colour thin head, lots of carbonation, leaves you bloated and unsatisfied, almost any light beer is better, Crystal, labtts low carb light beer is much tastier, but to expensive.
RSRIZZO (1378), Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 |
Oct 10, 2007 Had this beer on 10/15/1998. Almost no aroma. Color is a very light gold good carbonation and thin head. Taste is very light with a lightly bitter finish.
patrick767 (2091), fort wayne, Indiana, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Oct 2, 2007 bottle - If you want a beer that’s watery and tastes like almost nothing, reach for a Beck’s Light. But if that’s not available, get this one. I have no idea why you’d want to do so because the fact that you’re even reading this website suggests you like flavor in your beer. All I can see is that worse beers do exist.
BallyLoser (134), Redmond, Washington, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Sep 27, 2007 Not bad for a light beer. Since it is a light, it has a light colour and texture. Goes down very easy with a bit of a sweet taste. good on a hot summer afternoon and definately for high volume drinking.
Hammster (187), Eagan, Minnesota, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Sep 8, 2007 Updated: Sep 9, 200724 oz. can. Looked good when my mind fooled me into thinking it poured like a wit. Soon as the carbonation cleared I saw it was only a very light pale lager lacking any sophistication or color. The head was decent. Very light aroma with only a hint of malt. Flavor was better than I expected for a light beer. There was actually hops in the taste which was shocking. The finish is noticeably weak and watery. Enjoy the light, carb counters. I hope to never drink this again.
KingofCastle (202), London, Ontario, Canada
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Sep 2, 2007 bottle: Watery, lacking any flavour. The wicked carbonation & cheap thin head with no lacing betray this beer’s awful ingredients. Other than the slightly floral aroma, it is almost a phantom beer. The only interesting thing is that so many Canadians have been brainwashed into thinking this is "the good stuff."
polomagnifico (547), Saginaw, Michigan, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Sep 1, 2007 On tap. No nose since it was served below freezing. Pale yellow color with no head. macro taste and watery feel. lively carbonation.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)