 nefarious (203), Clarkston, Michigan, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 9/20 |
Mar 1, 2009
Wow......this is just like a bad heiniken. Pale golden pour and skunky aroma. Very easy to drink.....not much more than that.
FreshHawk (186), Iowa City, Iowa / Hull UK, East Yorkshire, England
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 14, 2010 On-tap.
A - Pale, clear golden color. Decent sized fluffy white head.
S - Grainy sweetness, along with a little bit of grassy hops. Nothing exceptional, what really what is to be expected from the style.
T - Similar to the smell. Mostly grainy and sweet malt flavors with maybe a touch of honey. Some grassy malts. Pretty mild taste.
M - Light to medium body. Decent carbonation. Crisp and slightly smooth for the style.
D - Really quite drinkable. Refreshing and a good beer to get at a bar with limited selection.
Notes: Easy to drink and inoffensive beer, but nothing special about it. If you want something light and easy to drink at a bar, this isn’t a bad choice.
dEnk (363), Den Haag, Netherlands
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Mar 13, 2010 Golden pour, small head.
Aroma of malt, syrup and faint hops.
Flavour is very light bitterness followed by sweetness of malt.
Just another boring lager.
Pedrojcai (51), Cádiz, Spain
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 8/20 |
Feb 28, 2010 Kronenbourg is one of those beers that I could’ve lived my whole life and been OK with not trying. It was quite simply nothing special. If I want a brand tasteless pale lager, I can go to my local cheap beer. Absolutely nothing special beer.
Sammer (125), Plano, Texas, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 |
Feb 26, 2010 Golden pour from bottle in Nantes, France. Maybe it’s just me, but some beers seem to taste better when you are traveling overseas in the country they are produced. Typical lager, but well balanced taste. I’d drink this one again. Salute!!
verstellung77 (19), Westminster, Colorado, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Feb 24, 2010 Notes for me: Refreshing West European Lager. Decent hop bitterness, but little aroma or finish. Thiner feel like the popular (yuk) American lagers but with more malt and overall more refined......less maize I suppose.
jodah52 (91), Michigan, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/20 |
Feb 15, 2010 Honestly, this is pretty bad. A purely generic light lager with (in the USA) a considerably higher price tag than its peers, like Coors and Bud. You can buy Moosehead for cheaper, and Pilsner Urquel for the same price; both are better than this.
garmonbozia (262), Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Feb 14, 2010 I didn’t care for this too much. basic corn taste with lots of carbination. there was a small detection of hops, but not much. Very boring beer
Rustyham (691), miami, Florida, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Feb 10, 2010 Lame macro with a slight taste of wheat, corn, and cheap white wine. Bottle at ABC liquors, Miami.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)