biir (555) - Berlin, - NOV 6, 2015
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Is this the answer to Saku Kuld? Maybe, but they done worse. This is just basically pee-colored water, like the other reviewers mentioned.
phfyysik (366) - Tartu, ESTONIA - OCT 28, 2015
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Fancy bottle, but thats it. Regular thirst quencher but not special beer. Good to enjoy with meal.
Gangstergafje (479) - Capelle aan den IJssel, NETHERLANDS - AUG 8, 2015
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
The beet looks really nice. The bottle gives a very luxury look. The color is a brights golden yellow. It looks like a good single malt. The beer forma some rough white foam. The smell is nice. There is some sweetness and a nice fresh smell. Not that special, but nice. The taste isn’t that strong. There is a nice hoppy taste and some sweetness. Quite nice and refreshing. Not that special though.
TorbenJensen (1413) - Valby, DENMARK - JUN 24, 2015
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Very compact foam. Very little aroma. The taste is watery and has almost no malt profile. Hops profile is anonymous and almost not being present. The bottle with foil lined neck and label exudes elegance and beautifully cohesive design, but the content is surely not exciting. It is brewed to mark the brewery’s 200th anniversary, but in my opinion a little wasted effort. Well, it is easy to drink because of the lack of malt and hops flavor. It is more a thirst-quencher than a beer.
tarmok (1002) - Tartu, ESTONIA - JUN 1, 2015
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Appearance: clear golden liquid with frothy white head. Aroma of hay, caramel and raw water. Taste: heavy sweetness, medium bitterness, lightly sour, cardboard. Palate: light body, thin feel, average carbonation, long finish,
Senka (1036) - Tallinn, ESTONIA - JAN 17, 2015
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Smoth pale lager. Initial batches were oh so fancy. All other times it is mostly on sale. Just a simple lager in a clear bottle. Was popular in pubs and clubs some time ago, and the bottle was also screw-top at the begging. You Could open one with another. Now it is not the case.
Erzengel (7115) - Wuppertal, GERMANY - JAN 3, 2015
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 5/20
* Old rating, many thanks to kevnic 2008. Best before 14.01.11. Malzig-süßliches Bier. Nicht zu tief. süßlich-wäsrig, süffig.
ectuohy27 (941) - ESTONIA - MAR 31, 2014
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 14/20
Decently drinkable PL, remarkably smooth and rounded finish, though the taste experience before that is alcohol (surprisingly for a 5.2% abv PL) and water. Nothing ’special’ at all
jann3 (250) - Espoo, FINLAND - JAN 24, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Clear golden color, white and quickly disappearing head. Aroma is malty with some spicy bitter notes. Taste is malty and sweetish, with notes of bread, fruits and even a hint of caramel. Sweetness is combined with some grassy hops. Decent pale lager, but nothing special. (0,5l bottle, best before 22.7.2014)
oops (211) - Tallinn, ESTONIA - DEC 8, 2013
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Classical eurolager. Appearance is the only positive thing - pours really clear an pale yellow. Otherwise - low aroma, low taste, quite carbonated.