RateBeer
Abbots Lager 1.79 4

Abbots Lager


 Percentile 

Requires
more ratings

Brewed by Carlton & United Breweries (CUB)
Style: Pale Lager

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreSeasonalABVStyle PctlServe in
41.4/5.01.79/5.0Special4.9%0Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Celebrating 100 Years 1904 - 2004
 OlJuntan64 (1267), Perth, Australia
1.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/53/101/54/20
Oct 10, 2004  
PGC with medium size short lasting head. Stale corn and just going off eggwhite aroma. Thin low carb soda watery palate. Mild stale bitter hops with the barest hint of malty biscuit sweetness. Fades badly to a poorly cleaned 2 day old drip tray finish. Depressingly sad.


 Sully (1367), Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
1.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/102/54/20
Sep 9, 2004  
What a wonderful thing it is to celebrate a hundred years. There are a number of centenarians around who would undoubtedly be delighted to be called lighthearted, bubbly, not crusty, dark or even bitter. A fruity sort need not be compared with a full bodied, heavy old thickish stand-by either. Furthermore, the last thing a centenarian wants are comments about their aroma too. No problem here. Tthe only thing negative is the visual similarity to urine which may be a good thing in certain continents, but not incontinence.


 mutant (854), Melbourne, Australia
1.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/55/20
Aug 29, 2004  
Pale yellow with an enormous head that dissipated quickly. Aroma is sweetish but stifled by the can. Flavour is dominated by a sweet corniness and it was not very bitter.


 mullet (801), Melbourne, Australia
1.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/54/102/56/20
Aug 24, 2004  
Pale for a CUB product, reasonable head retention. Typical CUB aroma, but perhaps less chemical, with peanuts and metal, but it seems reasonably fresh. Thin, water cracker-esque maltiness, more bitter than most CUB products and watery but not too bad. I guess you could describe it as crisp (as stupid a descriptor as that is.) It’s probably better than most of their crap lagers but it really pisses me off that to commemorate the brewery’s centenary they would make something that’s exactly the same as all their other shit. Why not make something like they did 100 years ago? Oh well.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2010, RateBeer LLC