zimbo (866) - SCOTLAND - DEC 2, 2012
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Not as vile as some would have it but it does certainly have a rather odd raw edge to it which sits in the face of its sweetish front. PAle and structurally fails to go the distance falling apart and offering little head or a developing flavour or structure over time.
Roomspinning (3) - Alberta, CANADA - APR 10, 2009 does not count
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
Had this at a college party. Woke up three days later with my pants missing. Wretched aftertaste. Like sucking on a mouthful of old pennies seeped in dirty ditch water. Would definitely try again.
Beerdedone (3162) - Croydon, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 30, 2006
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Pours yellow gold with a white head. Aroma of sweet malts, grain, and slight hoppiness. Flavor is sweet malts, grainy, and a slight bitter finish. Not a good brew, yet drinkable.
DerWeg (1576) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - APR 26, 2006
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
I have to rate this from memory, to honor a character Lager that was so good (when it was very fresh.) Distinctive wild hoppy/yeasty bouquet, sweetish malt base, medium pale and foggy/unfiltered in appearance. Drank very cleanly given how it looked, with subtle mingling aftertastes of mild bitterness and grapey fruit. I fricken loved this but it was too unusual for the pencil necks at head Office to grok. Amazing delicate summer beer made with a defiantly Craft ethic.
boto (2062) - Granby, Connecticut, USA - OCT 27, 2002
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
A typical Canadian Macro. Nothing special.
jrm212k99 (35) - Hawaii, USA - APR 9, 2001
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Wow, this was atrocious. When it comes to bad beers, there are watery beers, and then there are just bad beers. This falls in the latter camp.
dbutler4699 (13) - Elyria, Ohio, USA - DEC 3, 2000
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
It’s really unfair for me to rate this beer as I think I got a skunky six pack (there was dust on the bottles when I bought it). If what I experienced was really what Algonquin tastes like, I cannot recommend the experience.