patricks110 (1917) - Alberta, CANADA - OCT 25, 2008
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A pretty average beer. Overall, the taste is unamazing, cheap and unflavourful. Aroma is corny, and plain. overly carbonated and light hoppy flavour
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - OCT 15, 2007
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Horrific. I could only drink a few sips. Dry, crispy, watery and extremely fizzy. Drink verrrry cold or not at all.
JAF737300 (1291) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - SEP 22, 2007
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
The beer pours golden with notes of sweet malt and some light hops. The flavor is clean and crisp with nice notes of hops at the finish.
PictouRx (154) - Ontario, CANADA - AUG 28, 2007
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Average no great thing, aroma is poor, clear golden color, aftertaste bitter.
muzzlehatch (4424) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - MAY 24, 2007
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
12 ounce can (the way God intended beer to be stored) from New Brunswick Liquor Corporation on King Street, Saint John, New Brunswick (May 2007), served immediately out of the fridge in a Duvel glass, and why the Hell not? This has got an enormous, actually quite stable smooth, fine-bubbled white head which sits atop a crystal-clear pale but dirty gold body; the head actually laces as it disappears so it gets a decent mark there, dadgummit.....well it smells like pretty much nothing, maybe some soap and sweat? or maybe that’s just me sweltering in the unseasonable warmth.....I could make up a whole bunch of fancy words to describe the complete lack of character I find when tasting it, I could go on about how it’s lacking in this malt or that hops, I could talk about force-carbonation and filtering.....but I’ll just say one word: saccharine.....finishes, oh do I have to use the word finish? can’t this experience just go on and on and on? No I guess not....metallic and dull, sweet and fake. OK I’ve done my part, I guess.
AaronBouchard (150) - Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CANADA - APR 5, 2007
4.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
UPDATED: SEP 1, 2007 This lager is very refreshing. Great almost floral aftertaste that is very drinkable. Has a nice yellow color. The body is on the light side but has enough substance to give it a distinct charactor. One of my personal favorites.
Lubiere (10746) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 2, 2007
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A yellowish lager with a thick white head. A lightly sulfury corn adjunct aroma. In mouth, well, a reasonable quenching lager, with a light biscuitty malt. Innoffensive. Can from Moncton, from Probstk.
HazelRah (276) - Summerland, British Columbia, CANADA - JAN 28, 2007
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Fills the mouth with an almost oily assertiveness, and that’s saying something for a lager at a hockey game! I didn’t detect any odd or nasty flavours, no metals, alloys, or fusel oddites to be found.
DuffMan (7499) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - JAN 16, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Can. Another middle-of-the-road pale lager. I don’t hate these, but I’m beginning to hate rating them. It’s hard to come up with different things to say about the same monochromatic style of beer.
TipsyMcStager (1139) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - JAN 15, 2007
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
faint malty aroma with some saltiness. Standard macro swillness. Cornish, flat finish.