MrHangover (3107) - Den Haag, NETHERLANDS - FEB 6, 2013
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can, 500 ml picked up at local supermarket. This is just your regular, average lager typed beer.. Looks ok, smells a bit skunked with malty touches (interesting..) and has a bland flavour. Really nothing special....
Martinus (3568) - Baarle-Nassau, NETHERLANDS - JAN 15, 2013
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Clear golden colour, white head. Aroma of malts, hay, light hops, quite fresh. Rather sweet flavour, very light bitter. Light body, short finish.
Refreshing and quite balanced. It’s a lager, but not a bad one.
(From 50cL can @ home)
MaartenRF10 (1669) - Wageningen, NETHERLANDS - DEC 5, 2012
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: NOV 1, 2013 Clear golden, white head, sparkling. Boring beer, malty with some dough and hay.
Douberd (3059) - Arnhem, NETHERLANDS - NOV 19, 2012
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
(From notes) Until now I’ve seen this one only on cans. So I had this poured from a 500 ml can at home. The colour is deep golden yellow, andit pours a one finger head, which disappears fast! Its smell is of malts and hay, nothing out of the ordinary. The taste is not bad, ordinary lager. What is bad is the moutheel. Not awful to the point you don’t want to drink it, but bad, it’s so watery is like someone gave me water with a couple drops of beer.
Overall? Not going to drink it again any time soon, as the most positive was its colour.
DutchDrebus (4598) - Oirschot, NETHERLANDS - OCT 11, 2012
2.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
50 cl can at home. Pale yellow colour with a fluffy, cloudy white head. Smells malts, grains, some sharp hops. Tastes malts mostly, slightly grassy. The lack of carbo makes this beer feel and taste thinner than it is. If it had a bit more carbo it would be a decent beer, now it?s mediocre. René Froger isn?t a real beer drinker i guess.
Edit: The more i drink, the worse it gets. This is quite bad.
ha1ag (756) - Maastricht, NETHERLANDS - AUG 25, 2012
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Canned from local supermarket. Very light golden color. No nose. Aroma is soft malts. Flavour is malts and grass with some very light hops. Could use more hops.
dutchbeerpages (1777) - Wilnis, NETHERLANDS - AUG 21, 2012
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
It apparently has flavor. where it is I do not know. Some in the top of the mouth maybe, slight bitterness. I finished the can, but I am finished with Amstel blond 4.0
rok1024 (1192) - Maribor, SLOVENIA - JUN 26, 2012
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Average aroma, appearance, taste and palate. Decent, somewhat memorable. Rated in the past from the can.
kiwianer (3428) - Otorohanga, NEW ZEALAND - JUN 21, 2012
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Canned/ The head is medium, the body yellow. It smells malty. the taste is malty and watery. 7/7/7/7/9/6
erickok (4135) - Tours (and Paris), FRANCE - JUN 15, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Golden body with a white soapy head that’s not bad at all. Very grainy, but agreeably also a slight classic hop aroma. Very moderate. Drinks very easy, light sweet overall. Of course similar to the Amstel pils, but a bit sweeter. As I understand this is only at 4% so it gets taxed less, not because of taste or something. If anything I prefer this over the normal version; although that doesn’t say much. (33cl bottle)