2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 jerohen (1793) - Bussum, - SEP 4, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 Psytron (567) - Turku, FINLAND - MAY 15, 2012
Minimal smell. Pale golden colour. Tiny head. Watery. Slightly malty. Metallic aftertaste. Flat.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 rcasta (721) - EL SALVADOR - MAY 10, 2012
pura mierda tomar lagers no se lo recomiendo a nadie porque despues solo van a querer beber para ponerse a verga; tipo nandez
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 Marduk (379) - ESTONIA - MAY 3, 2012
0,5l can. Do I really feel very faint hops in it? Or my mind is playing tricks with me?
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 BlackHaddock (1709) - Shropshire, ENGLAND - APR 30, 2012
May 2009: Brown 330ml bottle, 4.1% ABV. drank during a 5 lager/pilsner tasting on a hot and sunny afternoon in my back garden. This beer came second to last, beating only a cheap Greek can of Hellas Pils.
Typical pale Euro lager look, light golden body with a fast departing white head.
Gets my standard 3 score for an odourless pils/lager. Nothing to report nose wise at all, not even grasses or metallic, nothing could I pick up.
The odourless theme was kind of carried on into the taste, it was tasteless as well as odourless. My bottle was part of a pack brewered for Heineken (UK) Ltd and had 7 months life left when broached. Why do they want to import sub-standard lagers into a country that is awash crap home brewed lagers already?
Watery and weak feeling to this beer, not impressed at all. I remember this beer before Amstel was taken over by Heineken, it has gone down hill since those days in the 1970’s.
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 deusax (364) - Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND - APR 9, 2012
Plutôt pas mal pour une bière commerciale. Assez agréable en bouche, avec quelques jolies notes de malt
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 vipinvelp (323) - Velp, NETHERLANDS - APR 7, 2012
Very pale clear yellow color, little white foam. Dissapearing quickly, low carbonated, not too bitter. A regular mass production beer.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 MalcolmTucker (289) - SCOTLAND - MAR 30, 2012
Draught. Tastes like most other macro brewed pale lagers. Does a job for a lunchtime pint on a sunny day.
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 Grzesiek79 (1505) - Radom, POLAND - MAR 15, 2012
grass, roasty, rotten eggs, clove, pale, clear, frothy, light sweetness, lightly bitter, medium sourness, thin feel, light body, fizzy, bitter,
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 Plaas (29) - Alkmaar, NETHERLANDS - MAR 7, 2012
Another easy commercial lager. Not bad, not good either. It is quite sweet and, for such a commercial beer, quite yeasty too. No hops detected. The mouthfeel is actually not bad, it is not dry or carton-like or something. If we declare "comercial mass-produced lager" a seperate style, this one may score quite good, I think, but everyone who knows how real lager tastes should avoid Amstel just as much as all the other commercial lagers.
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 MaartenRF10 (518) - Wageningen, NETHERLANDS - MAR 6, 2012
Clear dark golden, white head. Too dark for a lager. Soft taste, not very hoppy or malty, easy to drink. Some sweetness. Low carbo, dies fast.
|