 Fukito (591), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Mar 5, 2008
Can, november 07. Fizzy, clear pale golden color with a medium, bubbly white head. Slightly sour/ doughy, yeasty bread aroma. Neutral flavor with some acetaldehyde and a slight very slight malt touch. Medium to light palate, thin and watery with a short finish. Neutral, bland but not offensive pale lager.
FatPhil (2102), Espoo, Finland
Aug 30, 2008 500ml bottle.
Rich gold, scummy film head. Nondescript dusty aroma. Something else, not sure what, but it’s not good. Bletch! Watery and acrid palate. Fair amount of something like weetabix in the taste - raw unsophisticated dry grains and husks. (Don’t get me wrong, I often like huskiness, and weetabix tastes, but this has it all wrong.) Chemical hops, yeuch, and also plain white flour. Fortunately it’s pretty weak, so the minor nastiness isn’t going to kill as I finish the can. I think that’s probably because the metallic harsh hops are quite drying, and making me thirsty.
Skidds (180), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Aug 10, 2008 I have always credited the Netherlands as being very competent brewers who make quite good beer. This however was one of the worst beers I’ve ever had. It reminded me of some cheap 1$ a beer beer from North America. Watery and Tasteless.
nelsonibarruri (51), Uruguay
Jul 26, 2008 Lata. Otra cerveza para tomar cuando no hay otra. Ni buena ni mala. Es cerveza.
gam (529), brisbane, Australia
Jul 2, 2008 Plenty of head on a gold pour,carbonation good enough,aroma salty,lemon.Flavour woody,oily,bitter,not a good bitter more sour,hops havn,t had a chance to settle.Finish,thank goodness,awful stuff.
tomciccateri (447), Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Jun 22, 2008 500ml can in Amman. Well carbonated, little evidence of hops or malt. Full mouthfeel, but mostly from CO2. No off-flavors at least.
|
