joeycapps (1468) - Waterdown, Ontario, CANADA - MAY 4, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Straw yellow w/ white fluffy head. Light nose: some malt. Watery body. Very mild, watery malt flavour w/ just the slightest touch of bitterness.
mrkimchee (1414) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 5, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
lite beer with a nit more body than most but still not great. small amount of straw-ish malt and even less hops. bleh.
HeistAlmighty (1000) - Saint John, New Brunswick, CANADA - OCT 16, 2011
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
355ml bottle. Pale yellow colour, foamy white head. Aroma is grain malt, a little bit of lager funk and actually some hops. Taste was much the same. Impressed they actually put some hops in a light beer. Palate was a little watery, as is expected, but no more than anything else in the style. Lots of carbo. Overall, pretty good for a light. Stacks up well against other low cal beers like the 67 and even holds up the the non-light version.
Slacks (615) - Bolton, Ontario, CANADA - APR 29, 2006
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Draught @ The Brewery: Chalk a higher score up to lower expectations. I wasn’t a fan of the blonde so I wasn’t expecting much from a lighter version of it. The head stuck around longer this time, with a very pale yellow colour on the pour. Flavour was more subtle, and thus to me, more enjoyable. A touch more sweetness, which offered more going on than the blonde. I feel the same way here as I do in the Corona vs Corona Light battle - go with the light, it offers less to be disappointed about.
beanmedic (347) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 9, 2007
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
essentially a light version of the blonde. the blonde is fine and so is this i guess. taste is subdued. yellow. yawn.