radiomgb (2580) - Peterborough, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 30, 2004
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: JAN 18, 2005 Bottle. Beautiful deep ruby in colour, cream coloured head and great lacing. Aroma of pine, hops, citrus and caramel. Flavour is incredibly hoppy, some sweetness, lots of caramel and pine. Finishes with a big hoppy, dry, lingering bitterness. Thanks ClarkVV for letting me try this.
Tap. Deep amber in colour. Intense aroma of pine and citrus hops. Flavour was hoppy but smoother then from the bottle. Slightly sweet, still lots of citrus hops and pine needles. Medium body and high carbonation. Finishes with a very long and refreshing dry bitterness.
Crockett (1054) - Southampton,Ontario, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 30, 2004
4.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
UPDATED: MAY 22, 2004 Dark red, beige head. Roaring boiling pour. Lots of roast and maltiness in the nose. Mouth feel was superb. Piles of dried fruit, caramel, malt. Notes of cherry, dates, raisins, bread, and honey. Very full bodied. Lovely ale flavour. Nice finish. Fantastic. I'd kill a man for another. Thanks Mr. Kimchee. Updated: More or less the same. I didn't adequately describe how hoppy this beer is. Lots of hops in the nose. Very bitter.
kujo9 (1095) - North Ridgeville, Ohio, USA - JAN 29, 2004
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 14/20
I can't freakin believe I've not rated this one yet! Anyway...Coppery brown w/a lasting beige head. Assertive piney and grapefruit hop aromas that get stronger as it warms. Light caramel presence and a hint of roastiness. Seems to be very little fruitiness. Hoppy grapefruit citrus very well balanced by a caramel and roast presence. Fruitiness seems to be from the hops only, but there is a light fruitiness present with a very, very light banana ester. Aftertaste is hops...go figure... and has a dry finish. Fuller medium body, moderate carbonation, and a very smooth m/f. I'm not an Am. IPA fan, but this is very well made and drinkable in quantity which is a nice change from my normally malt driven palate.
AleDrinker (1089) - Sunnyvale, California, USA - JAN 28, 2004
4 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: SEP 8, 2004 Pours brown/red color with medium offwhite head. The aroma is great- berries on top of carmel malt, smells delicious. The taste is great- the malt really stands out, the bitterness really stands out, the alcohol really stands out... but yet there is still a decent balance to this beer... complex and sophisticated. This beer is over the top. Very strong alcohol content, strong hop flavor, potent malt. I love it.
atpayne (615) - Zionsville, Indiana, USA - JAN 26, 2004
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
A redish brown color with little head. Aroma is a balance of malt and hops, and the hop aroma is a nice clean smell. There was a bitterness, but it was by no means overpowering. The hops seem to balance well with the presence of a carmel malt that smooths out and makes a slight sweetness more noticable as the beer warms up.
SG (465) - Valley Center, California, USA - JAN 26, 2004
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Somewhere between ruby red and earth brown with no head. It has a sweet, malty nose with a hop presence in the background. Full on the palate with a malty sweetness in the middle that gives way to a nice hop sizzle on the end. There is a slight caramel presence as well. The first touch on the tongue of each sip is very bitter and alcohol-laden, but the sweetness of the middle balances this out nicely. Different flavors jump to the forefront and background as the beer warms up. Excellent offering.
Enniskillen (2044) - Salinas, California, USA - JAN 25, 2004
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: FEB 25, 2004 Re-Rate
Much, much better this time, possible skunked bottle, but is that possible with Stone? Almost seemed chewy with a very nice presence of Hops! Had with a wedge of Jarlsberg.
Original Rating 1/25/04 I really did not care for this beer, maybe I was expecting too much? It was just too strong for me. I guess I should have red the back label eh? Maybe I will be a big fan eventually, but not on this day, I'll stick to my non-strong ale's.
fasteddieIX (55) - Rochester, New York, USA - JAN 24, 2004
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Pours a nice brown color with aromas of caramel and toffee, which also form the majority of the flavor. Make no mistake, it's quite bitter, but comes off fairly well.
bitter (1136) - Henderson, Nevada, USA - JAN 22, 2004
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: MAY 25, 2006 on tap: alright alright...everyone get over this beer already, deep carmel brown color with a airy head that disipated, nice hop character....with some alcohol taste. its a good beer but not a great beer. ive tasted better pale ale-strong ale types in my time. but since everyone thinks the name is real cool we’ll all drink it whenever we can. everyone just relax with the ’stone’ thowing!
dhickethier (1) - Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 20, 2004 does not count
4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
At first there didn't appear to be an aroma, but it picked up as I took a few drinks and noticed a slightly spicey aroma. The rich redish color hinted of the full body taste to come. The flavor was strong with hops and caramel and maybe a hint of spice. The taste held well and since I like beer with a distinctive flavor that is not too bitter, I really enjoyed this one.