TheGreatKen (76) - San Diego, California, USA - JUN 19, 2004
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
It’s a very crisp lager. Tastes a little better than the American standards. It goes well with salted edomame (soybeans).
hershiser2 (1228) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - JUN 8, 2004
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Light yellow, watery looking, no head. Smells nasty and cheap. Tastes watery, plain, and grassy. Pass on this one.
YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - JUN 6, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Crap. Pale yellow swill. Aroma of bad beer. Weak and watery. Flavor on a par with Corona and Bud Light. Use for watering your driveway.
Roli (405) - laval, Quebec, CANADA - JUN 6, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Ok beer. I was expecting worse when a friend gave that to me. An easy to drink macro-tasting beer. Not tasting a lot, but its not tasting bad, and its refreshing!
Eructoblaster (3055) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - JUN 2, 2004
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours a pale straw and overcarbonated body typical from the asian lagers. Head is bubbly and thick but do not resist to the first sip. Light malty aroma with light grassy hints. Taste is OK. It is well balanced, lightly hoppy and the final is relatively long and bitter. A step above Sapporo Premium.
kwoeltje (2232) - Manchester, Missouri, USA - JUN 1, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
very pale yellow. Head fades quickly. Almost no aroma. Fairly generic mega-lager flavor. Not bad at all, but nothing to recommend it.
beastdog75 (363) - Brick, New Jersey, USA - MAY 26, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Has a very generic flavor, with some graininess, fruitiness and a cardboard-like dryness. Not really bitter at all. I suppose it could be considered crisp and easy to drink, but I can’t imagine myself having too many of these.
Pailhead (4897) - Brownstown, Michigan, USA - MAY 21, 2004
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle: Virtually no aroma. Only thing I can really pick up is a slight skunky aroma, but when I say slight I mean slight. Pours a transparent pale yellow with a small white head that disappears almost instantly. Somewhat malty taste with a slight bitter finish. That is being generous though because there really is about as much taste as there is smell. Almost none. Watery mouthfeel and not much aftertaste. Very boring beer. The Bud/Bud Light crowd would think this is a good beer. I don’t.
OD40oz (773) - Box Elder, South Dakota, USA - MAY 17, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: JAN 31, 2009 I tried this at a local bar that has numerous different kinds of beers. It wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be but I wouldn’t go out of my way to drink it again.
bu11zeye (11971) - Frisco (Dallas), Texas, USA - MAY 11, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
(Bottle) Pours a pale golden color with a thick foamy head. Beer was drinkable, but had no character and was kind of boring to drink.