2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Clean gold pour with a fluffy white head. Your standard run of the mill gold. Decent for a mediocre style I suppose
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Tap @ the brewpub - I am going to go out on a limb and say this is the worst beer this brewery has produced to date. One sided/dimensional beer with a slight bit of grainey sweeetness, extremely thin, clean, but nothing to it, the finish drops right off.
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
A light wispy corn aroma. As the name implies looking glass gold. A good clean crios flavor for what it is. Very refreshing with almost no bitter. A paper thin palate but with good carbonation. Good refreshing drinker just not much to it.
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Name: Looking Glass Gold Ale
Date: 08/13/2005
Mode: Draft
Source: Brewery
amber, nice fine beige head, solid lace, sweet carmel malt arome with light floral hops, a signature carmel sweetness with a decent amount of hops and bitterness,
-------- />
Name: Looking Glass Gold Ale
Date: 03/31/2006
hazy pale yellow, not as sweet, still a nice bitterness
Aroma: 4/10; Appearance: 4/10; Flavor: 4/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 7/20
Rating: 2/5.0
Drinkability: 7/10
Score: *+/4
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
on tap-pours a white head and yellow color. Aroma is light/medium malt. Taste is light/medium malt-slightly sweet, light hops bite. OK/mild carbonation.
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Draught at the brewpub. Clear golden color with thin white head. One "word" describes this one...eh. Pertty non-offensive subdued grainy flavor and nose with a bit of hop waved over it,
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not their best beer, but a milder something for those beer drinkers who are perhaps not ready to commit to the matls of a porter or stout, or the hops of a Pale Ale. For everyone else, though, why drink this when you’ve got plenty of other excellent choices on the menu. I will say, this beer is very non-descript. That said, there is certainly nothing "wrong" with it per say except that the palate was a little watery.
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
draught. Cloudy light copper with a fast fading white head. This ale is so tame overall that it’s difficult to really pick out anything which would give it character. It allows some light bready notes and papery hops to be detected. Really weak brew.
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Cloudy brownish gold, with a thin white head. Faint but clean cereal aroma, Mildly fruity at frst, then a grainy note, then a crisp, peppery finish. Kinda watery palate.
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
On tap at the brewpub. Light gold in color with a big frothy fluffy poofy white head. Outstanding lace. Unfortunately, there is nothing here in the taste department. Compares well to Bud, and I imagine that’s why they make it. The minority opinion in my group came from Elissa who proudly said, "I could get drunk on that."
|
