bobjbkln (8) - Brooklyn, New York, USA - MAR 16, 2001
1.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
I bought this beer when they finally allowed it and its label into NYS. Wish they would have kept it out on quality grounds. Would have rated it even lower, but it is better than Bud or Rolling Rock (on the other hand it costs twice as much).
DocLock (8602) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 14, 2007
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Found from notes circa 2001 while cleaning the basement. This one was a golden color with aroma and taste notes of pale malt, hops, and mild fruit. I vividly recall all the hoopla surrounding the frogís obscene gesture.
jtw (1144) - farmington, Michigan, USA - JUN 3, 2004
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
copper amber color, smells like cider. apparently this is retired, so maybe my bottle is just old. since this beer is retired, and the last rating is from 2002, iím guessing itís just an old bottle. mostly malty taste with some thin hints of bitterness at the end--better than most macrobrews but not great. iíll admit to buying it for the label.
JPDIPSO (5124) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 13, 2002
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Golden color with a smallish head. This was a typical contract brew with a "cute" label.
Aggie80 (790) - Michigan, USA - JUL 15, 2002
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Okay stuff, if just for the label. I drove by the HQ for a long time and there was one of their bars for a while downtown, but it didnít make it. I enjoyed it okay, and it is better than most megabrews, but considering it was made in Frankenmuth, I would have expected more.
labattblueleaf (225) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - JAN 10, 2002
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
The label rocks. Thatís about it as I probably have overrated it. Can anyone tell me where I can get this stuff, especially the other brews they have? I havenít seen it in a long time. The only time I had it was at LSSU on a weekend.
hennes (934) - Fountain, Michigan, USA - AUG 29, 2001
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
My deepest apologies to Emily, who deserves better, but this poem seems appropriate to a dreary beer:
Iím Nobody! Who are you?
Are you - Nobody - Too?
Then thereís a pair of us?
Donít tell! theyíd advertise - you know!
How dreary - to be - Somebody!
How public - like a Frog -
To tell oneís name - the livelong June -
To an admiring Bog!
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - JUL 12, 2001
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: MAR 2, 2004 Gets a whole bunch of points for having a cool label and specifically for sponsoring my RAGBRAI team (Team Frog) a few years back. Doesn't get much in terms of points for flavor, unfortunately.
bipolar1 (268) - Hancock, Michigan, USA - MAR 2, 2001
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Once was enough..
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - SEP 11, 2000
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
If nothing else the label is cute. Average beer, fair malts and hops, a little weak for my taste, but still a clean and refreshing beer.