DocLock (4648), Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Oct 30, 2007 Bottle from State Line. Gold pour with frothy white head. Aroma is lemongrassy hops, pale malt, some honey and slight metallic and thiol notes. Light palate, with some grainy pale malt, citric hops, and mild honey notes, along with that slight thiol note. Not one I’d buy again. BückDich (4830), McCall, Idaho, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Oct 16, 2007 Bottle: Pours a light gold color with s yellowish green tinge. The nose is toasty with a light biscuityness and some light corn, sweet odd malt note. The flavor has a decent body, toasty, bright corn and light skunk. Funky, but plenty of flavors to do something with, not good ones, but they’re there. beerinmarch (2781), Alabama, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Oct 13, 2007 From the bottle, pours golden yellow with a tall fizzy white head. Dry grainy malt nose, strawn and light honey flavors. Hops were faint, but more present then most pale lagers. Overall a decent pale lager, good for its simplicity. Allie (40), USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Oct 11, 2007 Updated: Oct 16, 2007This is one of three Baltikas I sampled recently--the others being a 4 and a 9 (can’t find the notes I took on those, darn it). This was the one I liked least, but it ain’t bad at all. The brown bottle and the fairly simple blue-and-gold label are attractive. Poured with a thin, fizzy head that didn’t stay too long--not much lacing, but many small bubbles in the pale yellow body. The aroma was rather nice, above average for a pale lager, with a fruity, apple-like scent beneath the usual lager sourness. It tasted rather wheaty (though not as much so as the Baltika 9), with a sourish hop bite beneath. The palate was clear but not too watery. This isn’t terrific, but it’s still considerably better than most pale lagers. The price is good too; I paid $2 for a pint-plus bottle. I’d get it again, and I’d suggest it to anyone looking for something decent in the lager line. DownsouthGav (602), Greater London, England
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Oct 9, 2007 Nose of grass, vanilla and hops. Lots of carboantion. Pours a straw yellow colour beer. Taste is fresh and crisp but quite forgettable. Beershine (2686), Hue, Vietnam
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Oct 8, 2007 Updated: Aug 20, 2008Boring beer with some good qualities like the foamy head that leaves ample lacing on the glass. However, in a category with hundreds and hundreds of others.
Gold with really fizzy head as on a ginger ale, dissipates fast. Sweet yellow cake-like nose with some odd mayonnaise aromas. Soft but high carbonation. Sweet, very sweet, and phenolic finish. Weird stuff. jcwattsrugger (5223), Florida and, New Jersey, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Sep 28, 2007 16.9oz bottle-pours a diminishing foamy white head and yellow color. Aroma is adjuncts, faint light/spicy hops (saaz/continental?). taste is sweet adjuncts/grain, some lemon, light/spicy hops (saaz/continental?) with no bite, smooth, then second half of beer there’s some bite. OK carbonation. RblWthACoz (963), Brooklyn, New York, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Sep 7, 2007 "Classic Beer" That pretty much sums it up. Plain ol’ beer as far as I am concerned. You can tell it is mass produced and you may as well be drinking one of the big breweries of the United States. No quality, no personality.
|