MrManning (2009) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 30, 2004
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Sample- 500 Ml bottle. Pours a thick head that is gone in seconds. Sparkling golden body with some malty aromas. Taste is a tad sweet and malty, and very similar to other beers of this type. Drinkable, but nothing I would get if I had a choice.
Spiesy (2338) - Sydney, Greater London, AUSTRALIA - MAR 18, 2004
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottled. Thin golden colour, not much head to speak off. Malty, grain, cheep cereal aroma. Nasty larger. Available from the Russian Bar/Restaurant on Clarkenwell Rd.
dirtymike (2016) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - MAR 16, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
light golden in color witha small white head.Richy malty aroma and flavor,hoppy,nice malt palate,finishes sweet.
Mungo (2471) - Southampton, Hampshire, ENGLAND - MAR 12, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Some malt and hops aroma with typical 'lager' nose. Tinny bitterness and fleeting glimpses of sweetness. Average lager.
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAR 11, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Standard lager appearance with a moderately hoppy aroma. Fairly boring taste, just slightly bitter. Cleaner and a bit more satisfying than other Russian beers I've had but that isn't saying much.
nigos (631) - Ipswich, Suffolk, ENGLAND - MAR 10, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Light crisp slighty skunked grassy aroma. Light pissy hue with a fast disappating foamy head. Watery taste with a malty edge and a short skunky finish. Standard Swil.
chriso (7513) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - MAR 9, 2004
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
The head, like champagne mousse, rises up then quickly dies down to nothing. Low carbonation thereafter, leaving just a petillant prickle on the tongue. Very pale gold colour. Some fusty malt in the aroma, but quite faint. I also thought I detected corn adjunct notes, but that isn't listed in the ingredients. Sweetish initial impression on the palate, with some biscuity malt notes and an acidic edge appearing later. Not very hop accented. The finish is fresh, clean and vvery dry, but marred by a metallic tang that hangs around after all else has departed. Drinkable, but not very distinguished. 500ml bottle from beersofeurope.co.uk
mullet (849) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAR 3, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I thought this was OK. Pretty decent maltiness in both aroma and flavour. No real hop character but enough bitterness to balance. Well made, well balanced and drinkable but certainly nothing special.
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - MAR 2, 2004
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
White, bubbly foam which dissipates rather quickly, leaving a thin head. Pale-golden color. Aroma is bland, very slightly malty. Flavor is the same with a weird nasty aftertaste.
maeib (8749) - Wootton, Northampton, Northamptonshire, ENGLAND - MAR 2, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Very light coloured beer. Typical lager aroma, but not a bad flavour. Very clean, crisp and refreshing. Better than the huge majority of eurofizz.