leah2974 (445) - Georgia, USA - MAR 23, 2012
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bought under the "Sorghum Malt" label and was expecting more than I spud have under the "Sorghum Lager" label. Looks like apple juice. Almost no aroma. Fairly high carbonation with a mild flavor. Malty aftertaste. Sorghum not overwhelming. Hint of skunky hops.
MadIndian (2385) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 21, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A gift from SJ. A little thin in the body. What I noticed was a blend of spice, malt, grain, apple an alcohol. It was ok.
Could use more ingriedients or more of what it already had.
mcmisko (352) - New York, USA - FEB 14, 2012
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
If you must have a gluten free "beer", then maybe itís not so bad. Otherwise this is very metalic and artificial tasting. It is sweet, like splenda, and the finish is like very hard tap water. Not recommended to real beer drinkers.
Thorpe429 (5012) - , Illinois, USA - FEB 4, 2012
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Thanks to Huhzubendah for gifting this one. Served in a Bruery tulip.
Pours a clear light copper color with a very short head that dissipates quickly, leaving just a bit of a collar with some big bubbles. The nose is pretty off-putting and smells mostly of rice with a bit of staleness. Flavor is full of adjunct character. Yuck. Light body and crisp carbonation. Dry, off-putting finish. Why do I use "off-putting" so much? That sums up this "beer." Why would you create a gluten-free beer and emphasize the gluten-free part? Maybe some hop or yeast character. Yuck. Sick. Boo.
Barreras (982) - Diamond Bar, California, USA - JAN 20, 2012
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours an apple juice color with aroma of malt. Taste is slightly metallic with a crispness to it. Aftertaste of dry malt mixed with a little bitterness. Overall an okay beer that wasnít exciting nor boring.
Itzjerm (1291) - Taft, Tennessee, USA - DEC 3, 2011
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Oh my this is one of the worst beerís no... the second worst beer iíve ever put in my mouth. Beyond horrible. Best way to describe. Drinking Dish Water... Iíll have anything else please.
pushkinwow (2015) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 1, 2011
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
12oz bottle. Golden yellow with quickly fading, off white head. Sweet and slightly skunked malts, apples. Slightly thin and low carbonation, little sweet with some skunk, leaves a slightly bitter and apple taste on the palate. This is almost more like a bad cider then a bad beer. Yech.
RobertDale (3475) - Lansing, Kansas, USA - NOV 5, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
12 ounce bottle.. Pours a clear gold with a short lived white head. Funky aroma of sweet grain? Taste is a different kind of sweet. Obviously the sorghum. Not very good.
northropfrye (2215) - Steinbach, Manitoba, CANADA - OCT 29, 2011
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Well, what you can expect from a sorghum lager? Aroma is kind of sour, maybe some ginger. Pale orange colour, looks like apple juice. Taste is watery, sour, medicinal. I wouldnít need to have this again.
MrBeerFanatic (866) - Friona, Texas, USA - OCT 25, 2011
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pour is light to medium amber with a somewhat bubbly laced head. Aromas of light sweet caramel, with slight earthy notes. Flavors of grass, bitter malt, and ends with a light skunkiness. Bitter, dry, and somewhat crisp. Much like a basic lager but more on the bitter side than usual.