RateBeer
Barley Creek Antler Brown Ale
     click to upload
overall
26
16
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 82   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.78   EST. CALORIES: 144   ABV: 4.8%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This English style brown ale has a sweet caramalt maltiness. A rich deep chocolate color, our Brown Antler is mildly hopped with target and east kent golding hops.
Formerly known as Brown Antler Ale


3.1
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Phatz (225) - Paradise, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 2, 2006
ON-TAP: Appearance: Served a noble brown / caramel color. Frothy with lots of lacing; this is an attractive beer. Smell: It has a very typical brown ale aroma. It is sweet and malty, a bit clean, but has nice hints of brown sugar and caramel as well. Taste: Very approachable! Gentle sweet brown flavors with a smooth creamy malt attribute a-top a great Target hop character. The glowing feature of the beer is its quaffability and not an over-the-top glitz and glamour. Mouthfeel: Super smooth and creamy. Goes down incredibly easily. Drinkability: Barley Creek won first place in the Brown Ale competition for their Antler Brown Ale at the Atlantic City Beer Festival Competition. This beer is not a big firework beer but it’s standout attribute is how amazingly easy drinking it is. I brought a growler of this beer home. --- EDIT --- IN BOTTLE: I defiantly prefer this On-tap! I have only had this bottle about three weeks from the brewery. It has been in my fridge the entire time but it tastes a bit stale like it oxidized a little. A friend of mine said that most barley creek beers do better on tap. Whether that is true or not I don’t know but this one in a real disappointment. The aftertaste is **VERY** harsh metallic taste that almost leaves the feeling that i just came from the dentist. And I really liked the beer when I was there at Barley Creek. --- Hope this is helpful. Cheers!

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
MullMan (1099) - New Jersey, USA - JUN 29, 2006
12oz bottle. reddish copper color, thin creamy short tan head. aroma is of dried grass, flavor is like seltzer water. not really beer-like in the flavor. bizzare!

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Jine (896) - Nutley, New Jersey, USA - MAR 13, 2006
2.24.06 Decent little brownie. I could drink this or newcastle depending on what I was feeling. Drink ’em simultambiously. Needs a little bit more oomph. Bosch.

3.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
jcwattsrugger (11071) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - MAR 5, 2006
on tap-pours an offwhite head with copper color. Couldn’t get the aroma. Taste is sweet (there’s a theme developing with many of their beers), caramel, malt, hops. Not as dark/roasty as most browns. I enjoyed this more than the standard brown.

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Birdiebeagle (958) - Perkasie, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 7, 2006
Draft and bottle Pours a copper amber with a white head. Head lasts fairly well. Aroma has a roasted flare but lacked any real charactor. Taste was okay at best. Had a malty flavor with no bitterness present. This was alright but definately not my favorite.

1.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
MattShizzle (539) - Bernville, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 28, 2006
UPDATED: FEB 20, 2006 Not very good brown ale. Very sour, tastes infected. Not strong, very little hoppiness, some roasted flavor. Low carbonation

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
DarkElf (3033) - La Jolla, California, USA - DEC 11, 2005
(12 oz bottle: Obtained in trade with hopdog, thanks Steve!) I normally don’t rate beers that have obvious problems, but this beer is so special, it has the entire kit and kaboodle. Infected/sour, soapiness, diacetyl, AND acetaldehyde. Incredible. Massive carbonation was the first indication of the potential problems, but I never imagined to have such a great case study on my hands. Similar issues with the nose, except that there is actually something beerlike there, namely, a bit of caramel. Murky, ruddy, dark brown color, topped by a very tall, fizzy head that settles to a quarter inch of scummy foam. An obvious rerate, should I ever be so inclined.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 2/20
kramer (4860) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 9, 2005
12 oz bottle. Clear light brown pour with a thin white head. Light malt nose, some nuttiness and a little acidic. Flavor is sharply acidic and revolting, clearly infected. Like drinking malt vinegar. Thin and watery mouthfeel. Why this brewery continues to bottle is beyond me. There beers really weren’t that bad at the brewery, thin and weak, but not infected. It seems like half of all ratings for their bottles mention infection. CLEAN UP YOUR BREWHOUSE. I won’t spend money on your beers again.

2.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
ClarkVV (3891) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - DEC 9, 2005
2005 bottle from Zathrus, thanks! Pours a copper-amber color, initially clear, but towards the end of the bottle it gets extremely cloudy. Head is off-white and fully diminishing to a ring, with no lacing. Aroma of brown bread, light grains, malt husks and soily, nutty, watered down hops. Very low strenght on the aroma as well. Flavor begins severely dry and terribly lactic. Guess there’s some infection here, as it’s sour and lightly acidic and completely attenuated. It’s hard to tell if this is just severely acidified mash, highly astringent grains or a true lactic infection. Upon further thought, there was no gushing, so perhaps it isnt an infection. Whatever the case, there’s no malt sweetness, just berry skins, dry raisins and watered down brown sugar. Body is light, carbonation is moderate and the texture is very watery. No alcohol apparency, no real hop flavor either. Light toasted notes on end.

2.1
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
freekyp (1474) - Thomasville, North Carolina, USA - DEC 5, 2005
Copper colored with a slight, quicky dissipating tan head, I was all ready to break out the bangers and mash, but felt pretty uninspired after cracking this one open. The slightly toasted malt nose was inviting, but this brew was rather thin. A slight raisinly sweetness peeks out at the end, and I would have liked to see a bit less of that and more brown sugar sweetness. Not bad, but not impressive either.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3  4  5 6 7 8 9


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50