 jujubeast6000 (772), Houston, Texas, USA
Dec 8, 2005 12oz bottle from 24 variety pack: Light golden color, medium sized head, big bubbles, fairly quickly diminishing, aroma of malts, taste of malts, acidic, slightly bitter, light, not much flavor.
Magicdave6 (5400), London, Greater London, England
Nov 28, 2005 This is a bad beer tasting thats foresure. Aroma is minimal, but i think the can has helped it from not being skunky in any way. Taste is better than expected to be honest, with some sort of hops having a wee say.
bikesandbeers (468), Los Angeles, California, USA
Nov 25, 2005 it’s a lot better from the tap than it is from the bottle, but its still the same stuff. cheap golden fizzy european lager. The first sip always tastes a bit skunky, but it finishishes clean and crisp.
damirvrkic (55), Franklin ACT, Australia
Nov 14, 2005 Updated: Jan 10, 2007This beer is quite good, and I mean good. It isn’t the flashiest Pils around but it has good balance towards the malty side, dryish finish and bitterness. Not that hoppy but still a good balanced beer. One of the better beers from holland!
JoeMcPhee (4893), Jackson Heights, New York, USA
Nov 12, 2005 500 ml can. Very pale golden beer with thin white head, fading back quickly to thin lace. Aroma of hay, pale malt. Flavour is slightly sweet, pale malt, grassy hops. Comes across a bit industrial. Sweetish finish.
iammadeofjelly (183), Liverpool, Merseyside, England
Nov 9, 2005 Not that bad. served in a big 660ml. Pretty standard tasting lager served cold. Nothin great but nothin bad.
SudsMcDuff (1691), was CapeTown,SA-now Houston, Texas, USA
Nov 9, 2005 This not a bad beer at all, it is refreshing and has a very nice bitterness, similiar to heineken,becks,stpauli,etc. Just another average crisp euro brew that does the job when needed
Lou18 (1353), West Paterson, New Jersey, USA
Nov 5, 2005 This was nothing special. A bland Pilsner. Nothing more.
|
View Statistics
