jstu9 (402) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 15, 2004
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
(bottle) It was wet. Nothing of particular interest that I could detect, though not as bad as the typical macros floating around.
elsberry (87) - North Carolina, USA - JAN 9, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Tastes like a cross between Becks and Heineken. Thick and fluffy head, with a clear straw color and lots of carbonation, but a acidic aftertaste that made it tough to drink slowly. An average European pils.
egajdzis (5169) - Spring Mount, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 8, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Poured a golden color with a large fluffy white head and some lacing. Rather mild hop and corn aroma. Sweet corn taste and a watery mouthfeel. Smooth and watery, but not horrid.
sethdude (687) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - DEC 11, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Poured a straw color, decent head retention, low carbonation, floral hop aroma. Flavor is artificially sweet, corn. Alright, I guess. Aftertaste has grassy notes.
carboloader (648) - Houston, Texas, USA - DEC 1, 2003
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pours golden with large white head. Aroma is skunk and otherwise nondescript. Tastes like Heineken. Definitely among the worst supermarket beers I've tried. Save your money. Don't be fooled by the exotic name on the label. This is just another skunked pseudo-heineken.
HarmonKill-a-Brew (407) - Wilmar, Arkansas, USA - NOV 29, 2003
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Heineken, Becks, etc etc... not much difference. Not bad though. Nice color considering the style. Pleasent but slightly skunky aroma. Flavor was simular to Heineken and the like but was lacking... didn't have that slight hop bite that most of these green bottle lagers have.
RaginCajun (319) - Houston, Texas, USA - NOV 27, 2003
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
This stuff is horrible. Tastes similar to Heiniken in the fact that you can't get the skunk taste out of your mouth for days on end. What a pile of horse manure, they must have tried several decades to get a taste this bad. Give me beast light over this any day, at least that beer doesn't have offensive tastes that linger for days on end until you become homicidal and start stomping kittens because you can't believe someone would make such beer. No more beers for me from the Netherlands, THEY ALL SUCK! Nasty!!
layyze (28) - Durham, North Carolina, USA - NOV 21, 2003
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
This beer single-handedly set back my opinion of European beers for quite some time and has permanently set back my opinion of Dutch Beers. A horrbile skunk swill.
IDogg (72) - Houston, Texas, USA - NOV 20, 2003
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
This a bad beer that wants so hard to taste good. Foul smell. Typical light color with horrible fluffy head. Taste like an average beer only more malty. Good beer if you can find it cheaper than Bud Light, which is often the case in Houston
Eirikur (362) - hafnarfjordur, ICELAND - NOV 8, 2003
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Very typical Pilsener apart from the corny aftertaste, it is not bad though .