davidpl (435), Santiago, Chile
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Feb 10, 2008 Appearance: golden color. Medium head with white color and some rocky.
Aroma: malty’s and wheat’s smells. Some herbal touch from hops. A very slight reminiscences of amaretto liquor.
Flavor: malts and wheat grains start. Herbal touch and peel-lemon’s reminiscences. Some mineralized final.
Palate: light and watery. wilderthanyou (423), Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 | Mar 8, 2007 As with most Pilseners I’ve had, this is a pretty straight forward and
un-interesting beer. A typical pilsner appearance with a golden colour, and a frothy head. Aroma of hops, grains, and some sweet notes. Flavor is slightly sweet, with some bitterness. Mouthfeel is average, low carbonation for a pilsener. Certainly one of the better pilseners Ive had, but still not a big fan of this style of beer. daalamar (403), bardstown, Kentucky, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Nov 16, 2002 Nothing good to say about this one. Skunky aroma and a light watery yellow color. Small white head, and very little flavor. I think I will try my best to forget about this one. jstu9 (402), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jan 15, 2004 (bottle) It was wet. Nothing of particular interest that I could detect, though not as bad as the typical macros floating around. chmurarz (402), Raciborz now Legnica, Poland
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 2/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | May 4, 2007 I don’t know why they put wheat into it but it smoothens the taste. sweetish hoppy aroma and vel hopped flavour. appearance is por. very pale. but good quality brew. I like it. Panzerfaust (401), Santiago, Chile
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Mar 13, 2007 Can, 330 ml Pours a clear, flat golden color. Head is big, white and foamy. It lasts for two minutes and leaves an ugly lacing.
Aroma is hoppy and metallic. It has notes of citrus, eggs, vegetables, herbs, mint and hints white bread, cereals and straw.
Flavor is reasonably bitter, but watery at the same time. Lots of herbal and grainy touches. There is some lime, green tea and pineapple. Surprisingly this macro pale lager has a good amount of hops.
Body is medium, high carbonation as expected. Low alcoholic presence. Watery texture. Finish is dry and agreeable. Nothing special but I expected worse.
Thank you Paula, aka <a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/View-User-31163.htm&g for sharing this beer. Hunsell (400), Amsterdam, Netherlands
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | May 22, 2005 Another not enjoyable Dutch pilsener. Aroma is hard to detect, taste is more bitter than in other Dutch pilseners, but it’s truly not a nice, crisp clean hopbitterness. Tastes slightly skunky and old. gilvanblight (397), Windsor, Ontario, Canada
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Aug 17, 2007 Okay really not sure if I have the right beer. The can I drank from sys Bavaria Holland, but I don’t see that on the site. I see a Holdandia at 3% but this cearly states %5 alc./vol. Perhaps in Canada this was named Holland? Anyroad, going this this being the beer. Slight reddish tinge to an otherwise generic yellow pour. Thin but firm head. Odd scent reminiscent of candle wax with a touch of citrus. Very stron taste at first but fades quick with a nearly clean finish. Unfortunately that finish is a bit waxy. The taste is odd as is the scent. A bit of hops, then some citrusy grapefruit, then a horribly bitter bit. Overall not that bad, but not something I need to have again.
|