ansjelaah (847) - Westelbeers, NETHERLANDS - SEP 6, 2011
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Veel gedronken op feesten, voor het slapen gaan en bij de bbq. Blijft een goede pils
K-V-F-L (292) - LaVista, Nebraska, USA - OCT 16, 2001
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Decent but nothing outstanding; fairly standard Dutch pilsner. Head dissipates rapidly, although remains crisp and clean.
jredmond (4567) - Manhattan, New York, USA - NOV 26, 2007
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
12 oz bottle. This was better the heiny...although this is "premium"...
blackisle (319) - Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS - SEP 20, 2013
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
toasted grain, grassy hops, clear golden. frothy white head, lasting for a while, good lacing, slightly sweet, medium bitterness, smooth, light to medium body, nice dry finish with touch of sweetness, average carbonation,
Oakes (11031) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - SEP 30, 2001
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: APR 21, 2005 Golden colour with heavy grassy-hoppy aroma...plus hints of graininess. Thick bready malts blend with grassy noble hops on the palate. Moderately bitter. There is a definite huskiness, however and traces of alcohol that slightly undermine what otherwise is a pretty respectable lager.
MarshallMac (143) - West Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 5, 2002
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
good pilsner? very refreshing, crisp pils
Wizzard99 (32) - AUSTRALIA - JUN 30, 2002
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 15/20
In Australia this beer is very cheap, and with good reason. A very thin beer there is absolutely nothing special about this beer, and I would much prefer to drink my own home brew
GG (2019) - NorCal, California, USA - MAY 22, 2006
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Well, nothing horrible here and nothing fantastic either. This beer really can swing either way depending on how it was stored. Luckily, I seemed to have gotten a decent bottle because it was quite enjoyable and quite drinkable. I think it’s on the same page as a Tuborg (not quite as tasty) and much better the Heineken, Grolsch, Oranjeboom or other lagers from that region. Aroma was a bit malty with lots of rice coming thru. Appearance was a clear golden with a nice white head. Mouthfeel was a little harsh with average amounts of carbonation and a bit on the thin side. Flavor was grassy, malty, a bit sweet, quite crisp and quite refreshing! If I was throwing a party and wanted to maximize my dollar/beer/quality ratio then this really would do nicely!
heavy (2046) - Split, CROATIA - AUG 31, 2007
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: NOV 15, 2007 Another bottle, to edit quite simple rating:
0,25l bottle which poured golden colored body with thick creamy head. Quite typical lager aroma of bread and citrus hops with light malts. Nice flavor, quite full bodied for the style with low bitterness... moderately carbonated, relatively oily textured. Good palate, with nice relatively long finish. Nothing too special but surely one of the best commercial pale lagers.
slechtvalk (20) - ISLE OF MAN - JAN 7, 2013
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Zeer fijne pilsener, goed drinkbaar en erg redelijk geprijst. Aanrader!