 mike1977ok (648), Netherlands
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 |
Feb 22, 2007 Quite mild aroma, golden yellow colour with thick foamy head. A good tasting Pilsener that is not overpowering in any individual flavour but offers a good balance overall. It’s got enough sweetness to not to destroy the pallet after a few bottles making it a great session beer. Taste very clean but not in a chemically way. One of the better Dutch Pilseners and the best value of the premium brands.
jredmond (1090), New Jersey, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 |
Nov 26, 2007 12 oz bottle. This was better the heiny...although this is "premium"...
heavy (876), Split, Croatia
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Aug 31, 2007 Updated: Nov 15, 2007Another bottle, to edit quite simple rating:
0,25l bottle which poured golden colored body with thick creamy head. Quite typical lager aroma of bread and citrus hops with light malts. Nice flavor, quite full bodied for the style with low bitterness... moderately carbonated, relatively oily textured. Good palate, with nice relatively long finish. Nothing too special but surely one of the best commercial pale lagers.
daknole (3032), Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Apr 2, 2008 This beer is fairly decent. Not overly hoppy, and has some decent malt notes. Caronation is nice.
GG (1689), NorCal, California, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
May 22, 2006 Well, nothing horrible here and nothing fantastic either. This beer really can swing either way depending on how it was stored. Luckily, I seemed to have gotten a decent bottle because it was quite enjoyable and quite drinkable. I think it’s on the same page as a Tuborg (not quite as tasty) and much better the Heineken, Grolsch, Oranjeboom or other lagers from that region. Aroma was a bit malty with lots of rice coming thru. Appearance was a clear golden with a nice white head. Mouthfeel was a little harsh with average amounts of carbonation and a bit on the thin side. Flavor was grassy, malty, a bit sweet, quite crisp and quite refreshing! If I was throwing a party and wanted to maximize my dollar/beer/quality ratio then this really would do nicely!
chmurarz (402), Raciborz now Legnica, Poland
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 2/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
May 4, 2007 I don’t know why they put wheat into it but it smoothens the taste. sweetish hoppy aroma and vel hopped flavour. appearance is por. very pale. but good quality brew. I like it.
Oakes (8172), Beyond the Great Firewall, China
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Sep 30, 2001 Updated: Apr 21, 2005Golden colour with heavy grassy-hoppy aroma...plus hints of graininess. Thick bready malts blend with grassy noble hops on the palate. Moderately bitter. There is a definite huskiness, however and traces of alcohol that slightly undermine what otherwise is a pretty respectable lager.
MarshallMac (143), West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
May 5, 2002 good pilsner? very refreshing, crisp pils
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)