jenskrandel (1) - - MAR 29, 2013 does not count
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Was confused thought it maybe a dark beer not bad but not what I was wanting either .....But living in rule Kansas in was a nice switch from bud or its conterparts
DavidWoodruff (387) - Windsor, California, USA - MAR 25, 2013
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Appearance: Clear golden color with a momentary white head.
Aroma: A little grassy with some sweet malt notes.
Flavor: Malt and some alcohol.
Overall: I was prepared to really dislike this mass produced beer. As is often the case, preparation pays off.
Poobah (243) - New Orleans, Louisiana, USA - MAR 20, 2013
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Golden with no head retention. Grainy and corn nose. Slightly carbonated with somewhat noticeable hoppiness in the finish and a touch of honey.
LinusStick (2740) - Moon Twp, suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 19, 2013
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Ugh. A little better than a Budweiser. Donít know why I thought this was a dark beer (canít judge a book by itís cover!), but this is a nasty beer. Grainy with sweet malt in the front and nothing to balance it out. a little thicker and more syrupy than a typical BMC beer but not much. Nice carbonation canít save this sweet trainwreck.
drowland (5893) - Valdosta, Georgia, USA - MAR 17, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
3/17/13. 16oz can at Shantytown... apples. The aroma and flavor is apples and more apples. Almost cider like with a touch of hay. Acetlhyde, I guess? Bad
Palidor19 (2875) - Brandon, Florida, USA - MAR 17, 2013
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
If this is meant to be a premium the n it lacks everything fir that quality. It taste as an slightly stronger becks. The end feels a bit plastic like. Not much else
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
jandd1983 (2050) - Florissant, Missouri, USA - MAR 16, 2013
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
It poured a clear pale yellow color with a white head. The aroma was of light citrus and some grass. The taste was similar.
BREWMUSKCLES (2143) - New Jersey, USA - MAR 16, 2013
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
it is a different and interesting lager with a flavor of dark cherry not at all too apparent with a nice malt flavor in mid palate. finishes with some coarseness and a bit of bland hop hit in cleanser that i found demonstrative and successful for a macro brewer.
kwoeltje (2207) - Manchester, Missouri, USA - MAR 15, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
(bottle) pale gold with very little head. A little hops aroma. Flavor was thin malt, some hops. Not to mention that Beckís made in St. Louis is just wrong.
maekchu (1700) - Hirakata, JAPAN - MAR 14, 2013
2.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Some mildly stinky hops and grass. Clear pale straw, thin creamy head. Light grasss initial / some very minor hop notes in mid / very mild sweetish malty finish. Thin-medium body. Much sweeter than I expected. Not really a gem.