drowland (7382) - Georgia, USA - AUG 21, 2009
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Had on tap at the "brewpub." You can basically use one deScription for all of their beers - too light, pretty lame, and just not all that great.
heemer77 (5217) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - MAR 11, 2008
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
The body was slightly hazy light copper. The aroma was glazed donuts roses. This was possibly influenced by the place, which had a strange sweet smell overall, and by the place, I mean the brewpub. The taste was light corn meal with some marischino cherries. There was also a little bread crust. Thiss was a decent light lager that bridges the gap between pale lagers and viennas. Kind of like Huber’s Fat Cat.
SledgeJr (3577) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - AUG 2, 2005
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
On tap at the brewpub. Yellow beer with no head. The bubbles are not as ridiculously huge as in the Frog’s Leap Light. Again, a slight diacyl flavor. Overall, a better tasting beer than the Frog’s Leap with more of a tingle to the mouthfeel, but the diacyl mistake is discernable.