Slovak34 (99) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - SEP 30, 2002
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Not a bad beer, but there are better imports out there. It’s a shame that this is the beer American’s think of when they talk about a German Pilsner.
gws57 (1275) - Saint Charles, Illinois, USA - SEP 29, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Has a funky aftertaste but this is just about as good as a German lager gets. Expensive for a comparable lager. I would say it’s not worth it but it is pretty good. No head, rich golden color, sharp dry taste.
PorterPounder (5759) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - SEP 29, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: MAR 9, 2013 Rerate Revisited again after 11 years. Overall not a bad German lager - much better in can as I had today. Lacks the skunkiness usually found. Tastes have change after 11 years. Original 3.0 Kind of like McDonalds - you know what you are going to get going in. Good reliable standby when nothing local is available. Smooth, crisp, not too skunky of a aroma. One of the best of the ’Macro-imports’.
WastedYouthBrew (143) - Phila (Home of Geno's Steaks), Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 29, 2002
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
St Pauli, Heineken, Becks All taste the same to me, Well except for the little things. You know the little things! Would rather have a St Pauli Girl, damn that bitch is hot. This one time finished a St Pauli Girl and when no one was looking I put my peins in the bottle and proceeded to have my way with it. Hahahaha, that’s a joke, but im sure there is a sad enough soul out there that has probably done that. My prayers go out to you buddy. Aside from sticking my dick in the Becks bottle, I felt it to be average to better than average beer.
Duffbeer (192) - Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 27, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not the greatest, but not the worst. It’s drinkable.
herbstress3 (221) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - SEP 25, 2002
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
$1 a beer isn’t a bad deal but I wouldn’t say Becks is really worth a dollar. The casino in Vegas I bought this from must have had too many in stock cuz they were sure pushing the Becks. Slightly resembles beer, although maybe it should be classified as a sparkling water. Maybe they gave me a non-alcoholic by mistake:(
AleHole99 (12) - Wheaton, Illinois, USA - SEP 25, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Surprisingly, Beck’s. It’s not bad if you’re already buzzed.
2Pac (29) - Newcastle, AUSTRALIA - SEP 24, 2002
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
not too bad. not too good either. it’s drinkable, but not if it’s overpriced.
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 24, 2002
2.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not too bad but there are much better choices out there for less money.
OldJack99 (114) - USA - SEP 22, 2002
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
mwould try it on tap at a bar, not bad, not great, a little overpriced IMO.