2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 bb (4888) - Alamo, California, USA - FEB 10, 2004
Draft. Dark amber color. Very thin tasting and not much else to it. The best thing about it is it's appearance.
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 Volgon (2715) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - JAN 5, 2004
On tap in Salem, labled Marblehead Mild. Deep amber with a thin head, sweet malty aroma, funky sweet aftertaste, light bodied.
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20 dirtymike (2016) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - JAN 5, 2004
Deep amber in color with a small white head.Sweet and malty,with virtually no hop presented.
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20 ravidesai (916) - Bombay, INDIA - JUN 5, 2003
nice dark bready mild.
underhopped and a pleasantly sweet caramel malt flavour comes through.
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20 ericnixon (734) - Northampton, Massachusetts, USA - APR 6, 2003
Dark in color, with a creamy taste. i liked this one a lot. although, i only tried the sampler.
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20 Sammys (428) - Portland, Maine, USA - SEP 25, 2002
Cask version: This was a lot different than the kegged version, and I generally agree with Nutfield, that it was a much creamier and smoother beer. However, the drastic temperature difference between the two might make it hard to make a complete side by side comparison (cask beers generally being warm).
Keg version: Good as far as mild’s go I suppose, something which my lower than normal rating might reflect. I find it hard to objectively judge styles that I generally don’t care for though. My suggestion is to try it yourself, perhaps do what I did and get it in a 4oz sampler. (keg rating 3.0)
3.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 15/20 Nuffield (3087) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - SEP 10, 2002
Cask version: It was nice to have this side-by-side with the non-cask version: there ARE differences between these two. Much smoother, creamier, with a frothy and substantial head. Although, the carbonation is too intrusive here. Still, some nice flavors emerging (as with the non-cask Mild).
Keg version: Little aroma (true to form for a mild) but on tasting there’s something nice going on here. I wouldn’t call it maltiness, but there are caramel overtones. Served too cold. Hint of red in the color. Keg rating 2.7
|