papajohn (1249) - San Diego (Mira Mesa), California, USA - JUN 6, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 15/20
Tangy carbonation, sweet malt flavor, light hop bitter aftertaste. Good brew.
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JUN 2, 2002
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Quite light in flavour, but nice doughy peatiness ands smokiness, a bit nutty aswell, not bad, but certainly not great.
amx1970390 (480) - Southampton, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 1, 2002
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
Great beer! Especially when from a nitrogen tap in a pub. Great creamy head, extremely smooth, well balanced. The next time you see this, try it instead of a guiness.
Bolt (117) - Boulder Creek, California, USA - MAY 25, 2002
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Horrible... heavy vinegar taste. After reading all the other reviews, I hope it was just a bad keg at the local pub.
tourette (213) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAY 24, 2002
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Solid, well balanced ale. It has a nutty characteristic that I liked. Its full bodied and generally very good.
joeprogressive99 (6) - USA - MAY 20, 2002 does not count
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
This brew has strong caramel flavor with a hint of mocha. Finishes well but lacks kick. Overall an enjoyable beer that compliments most food very well.
Steak (124) - New York, USA - MAY 17, 2002
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
Such a nice dark reddy-brown color. The aroma was not very strong but their was a definite butterscotch aroma. The butterscotch was noted in the taste as well alongside a big malty feel. The beer was very, very thin towards the finish and I had thought that it would be much thicker, oh well. The finish seemed somewhat watered down and filtered and that as a dissapointment. Itís still good, but it has some things to work on.
Svartalf99 (4) - USA - MAY 13, 2002 does not count
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Typical Nitrogen charged widget can of beer. Itís okay as a Scottish beer (itís a little low flavor-wise for that...) and is definitely better than many of the offerings made in the States (Well, I will admit that itís not at all hard to do that!). For the person wanting to try something a little different itís worth the effort and Iíd buy it again (but itís lower on my list- Iím still going about trying new beers... Got a Zhiguly and a few others to give a whirl yet... :-)
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAY 11, 2002
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Winey aroma & chestnut colour. Slight nutty flavour, not bitter but watery. Good session beer but too light for me.
CourageBest (51) - Katy, Texas, USA - MAY 3, 2002
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Nice beer, a lot like Caffreyís or John Smithís in a can. While it is a little bit weak, itís still tasty. Nice to linger over a can or two during a movie or a ballgame.