Ontbeertaster (2348) - Ontario, CANADA - JUN 6, 2011
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Can, pour was golden colour, just what you expect from a lager, the taste was very grainy and wasnt terribly enjoyable, not one i would have again
JRock72 (605) - - JUN 5, 2011
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Same can as pictured. Poured clear golden yellow with little head. Kind of unpleasant harsh finish with some hay. Alright I suppose.
gunnfryd (12429) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - JUN 4, 2011
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Can. Golden colour with a white head. Aroma is fruit, malt, metallic, hay. Flavour is fruit, malt, metallic, floral, hay. Thin beer.
UM02 (331) - Quebec, CANADA - MAY 26, 2011
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Very mild watery lager beer. Not as bad as some reviewers are claiming in that it is not unpleasant or hard to drink and even if it is mostly tasteless that is still better than a lot of macro style bland lagers.
Meilby (9625) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - APR 20, 2011
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can 500ml @ Geokkjer
Pours clear golden with a white head. Aroma has notes of malt, grain and metal. Taste is light sweet. Body is light, texture is thin, carbonation is soft.
Geokkjer (6582) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - APR 20, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Can.Pours golden with a white head.Aroma malt, hay and fruitiness.Flavor is sweet with some malt and metallic notes.Medium body, average carbonation.
JoeMcPhee (9004) - Toronto, ON, Ontario, CANADA - APR 2, 2011
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pale straw colour. Very light herbal aroma. Lightly grassy with a little bit of wet cardboard flavour. Very light and drinks like a tropical lager.
Rasmus40 (13912) - Beder, Aarhus, DENMARK - MAR 3, 2011
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Clear golden with a white head. Aroma is chalk. I’ve never had that in a beer before, but I have no better word to describe it. Flavor is medium sweet with no bitterness. Watery and thin. Finishes sweet as well. Crappy lager. How is this a premium lager? It certainly doesn’t fit the describtion on this site. 030311
Maria (10191) - Thisted, DENMARK - FEB 27, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
It’s warm golden with a creamy, shite head. The aroma is maild, almost watery with notes of malt. The flavour is moderately sweet and as watery as the aroma with notes of malt, straw, metal, and the finish is dry and slightly bitter.
realbeeronly (1) - CANADA - FEB 17, 2011 does not count
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Premium, I THINK NOT. I took 3 sips, got so angry I bought this crap, and tried to look online to see what garbage ingredients are used as there are none on the can, and none found online either. Guessing a ton of corn sugar is used. Cheapest laker or lakeport beer in Canada tastes better, and those are garbage beers too. This has a terrible white chalk taste that lingers in your cheeks and tongue. DO NOT wASTE YOUR MONEY, I want a refund, even though I bought just one can. The forst thing that ran through my head when i took a sip was "how could the LCBO import such crap"