harrisoni (13733) - Ashford, Kent, ENGLAND - JAN 19, 2011
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
500ml can from corner shop on way home from work. Mid gold, thin near white head. It’s a half decent premium lager thing. Bit stale on the aroma. But there is some sweetish lemon. But its just a bit bland. But ok.
Hammy78 (739) - Dundas, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 16, 2011
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
500ml can sample purchased at the LCBO. Pours a yellow gold, with a decent white head, some lace. Aroma is a little grassy and hops. Taste is light a little hops. Decent beer.
PictouRx (142) - Ontario, CANADA - JAN 8, 2011
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
having a bad night i think with these new beers. Anyway, got a blueish 500ml can at LCBO to try. Pours light gold color, thick puffy head, does not dimisnish for sometime. Aroma smells like mouldy wet cloths. I take a drink and wince, dreadful, sour. Then I get gassy belching afterwards and a terrible aftertaste that lingers.
Lubiere (9999) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 1, 2011
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
A blonde lager with a thick white head. In aroma, chalky malt with german hops, grassy notes, not bad. In mouth, a smooth eurolager with chalky notes, biscuitty malts, light bodied. Not bad. Tasted Dec. 24 2010.
DuffMan (6745) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - DEC 28, 2010
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can. Pours a clear gold with an average white head. Aroma of sweet grains. Watery palate, bland graininess, metalic note in the finish. Not impressive by any standard, and certainly not worthy of premium lager status.
beer_fiddler (2) - Ontario, CANADA - DEC 14, 2010 does not count
3.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
Im going to rate this on the first time i had this lager i was extreamly impressed, not so much the second time. the first can i bouught had such strong vanila, nut, and strong oat flavour i was so overwhelmed with awsomeness. a month later i realy thought this would have been a fav of mine now so disapointed, not the same not even close. i can just get hints of ingredients that is used.
The consistency may be off not just the volumes in ingedients but the boil temp may be off i do know that the lower boil temp will produce more proteins in the wort (more body, less fermentables = more sweet flavours
tomtomtommy (1) - WALES - DEC 9, 2010 does not count
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
boring average lager but better than most in this really cheap price range (0.8£ a can)
yngwie (13567) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - DEC 9, 2010
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Can, courtesy of Dedollewaitor. It pours a clear, pale golden body under a decent, off-white head. Weak nose with some pale malts and fruityness. The flavor follows the same path, avoiding most opportunities to have anything noticeable. Thin body. Short, fruity finish, but weak. Super-boring and tasteless as hell. 100814
EHSRanders (1771) - Tjele, DENMARK - NOV 20, 2010
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
can. Clear golden colour with large frothy white mostly diminishing head. Weak malty aroma. Sweet flavor. Bitter finish. Watery palate.
Skinnyviking (7062) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - NOV 10, 2010
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can. High fluffy lasting white head. Clear yellow body. Weak mild malty aroma. Heavily carbonated weak sweet and watery barley malt flavor with little hops bitterness and a short aftertaste.