andyhwcinc (1514) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - FEB 1, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Enjoyed with a good friend while watching the NHL all star game. Supposedly this is the Walgreens beer? In all honesty this tastes better than Budweiser to me, but it’s probably much worse quality wise. Appearance of hay with rich white head. Aroma of hay water. Taste near beer, devoid of flavor and mostly water. Not terrible and drinkable.
LordFatbottom (10) - Arizona, USA - JAN 31, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Quite the american abomination. not sure why these chaps even bother to brew or drink something so horrific. I don’t see any reason to stoop to such low levels of beer brewing.
SuperDave (1932) - Beautiful Sunny Mesa, Arizona, USA - JAN 31, 2011
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Yellow pour with a fizzy head. Aroma of corn. Cream corn flavor. Weird aftertaste. I’m glad I have 5 more of these beauties to go!
daknole (9437) - Scottsdale, Arizona, USA - JAN 31, 2011
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Rank. Stank. Walk the plank. Im being Frank. Dank. Hollerin at Hank. Down in the Tank. Rotten Flank. This is no Prank.
SudsMcDuff (5934) - .....Manchester United.........., Texas, USA - JAN 28, 2011
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
bought at ..uh.. oh ya, Walgreens... . Pours a hay gold, good puffy foam, dies down to a respectable white froth, lacing is decent .. . thin stuff, but taste is ok, corn and a very mild bitterness .. . i’d buy this cheap shit again, but then again, i do live in a box .. . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BNgRpRuWGs
wxman (1474) - O’Fallon, Illinois, USA - JAN 28, 2011
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours a crystal clear very pale golden color with an initially robust big white head, that quickly diminishes but doesn’t go away entirely. There is some ringing of the glass even. Aroma is pale malt, corn grits and a bit of hoppiness. Taste is sweet pale malt and an odd smokey vegital character that is not unpleasant. Very watery as you might expect, but inoffensive. At $2.99 a sixer, this would make a formidable lawnmower beer when 90+ degree summer days return.
JRock72 (605) - - JAN 25, 2011
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
This beer is amazing for $2.99 as six pack. I loved every sip.
RayOhm (474) - Fergus, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 23, 2011
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
it sucked, but it didnt suck hard. to be honest, i wish cheap beer was this good in Canada. we pay twice as much for something that tastes like hooker spit.
Ontbeertaster (2340) - Ontario, CANADA - JAN 23, 2011
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
This beer is actually quite good. it pours golden and it has a nice flavour banana, good beer, would drink again and for the 2.99 six pack or the 11.49 2-4. You cant go wrong if you just want some easy drinking
nick76 (4258) - Tampa, Florida, USA - JAN 20, 2011
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
The aroma is that of a macro lager laden with adjuncts. There is malt and hops in there and the hops are surprisingly soapy. The appearance is super pale gold with a thin head. The taste is like the aroma except none of the unpleasantness I was expecting. The palate is thin but OK for the style. Overall this is one of those beers that you say to yourself you have had worse. On a hot day it can be at least as refreshing as most macro lagers.