Stldsf1 (616) - Florida, USA - JUN 24, 2012
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 11/20
Does this beer suck? Yes. Is it cheap as all crap? Yes again. That's what it is. Cheap. Get what you pay for
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
6PackAttack (6) - - JUN 28, 2012 does not count
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
For 50 cents a can, it gets the job done... kinda. Definitely worth trying once mainly for the novelty. Not as horrible as some have claimed, as it’s no worse than Bud Light or Natty. A good beer pong beer.
arventresca (567) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - FEB 14, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Reading some comments are funny, what the hell do you expect from a $3.00 six pack. Haha.
nealblind (1556) - Seattle, Alabama, USA - NOV 1, 2014
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
clear gold pour. Some big head. Aroma of corn, fake hops. Tastes sweet corn, cereal grains, sugar, honey. very slight bitter. for how sweet it is, it dries out decently on the finish.
Rupertnick (1) - West Richland, Washington, USA - DEC 13, 2014 does not count
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
This is comparable to old style Schaefer Beer back in the 60’s. It is very sweet and has an aftertaste just like Genesee Ale. If you drank any knick, back in the day, you would NEVER say the word corn in relation to this beer. It has no flavor of a true corn beer. Ever smell the tap beer back in 60’s or 70’s? Then you know this is a beer on its’ own that isn’t great but is passable for 3 bucks.
PorterPounder (6898) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JAN 12, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Tallahassee, Fl - Walgreen’s - Thomasville Rd - 12 oz can. Pours an oh so pale light golden with a slight white head that actually leaves slight lacing. Aroma is basically neutral, but when you try really hard you pick up some wet cardboard. Flavor is typical, cheap, industrial lager. Some grassy notes, a hint of honey sweetness, a lot of bland cardboard notes. Mouthfeel is slightly stinging, kind of like some of those low-carb efforts. Had worse.
Suttree (5844) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JAN 17, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Well, I was surprised to find a new tick in Maryville. How about that? Unfortunately, this was the most remarkable thing about this beer. Oh, and it’s 99 cent price tag, of course...
LordFatbottom (10) - Arizona, USA - JAN 31, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Quite the american abomination. not sure why these chaps even bother to brew or drink something so horrific. I don’t see any reason to stoop to such low levels of beer brewing.
andyhwcinc (1762) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - FEB 1, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Enjoyed with a good friend while watching the NHL all star game. Supposedly this is the Walgreens beer? In all honesty this tastes better than Budweiser to me, but it’s probably much worse quality wise. Appearance of hay with rich white head. Aroma of hay water. Taste near beer, devoid of flavor and mostly water. Not terrible and drinkable.
Fratto (2845) - Arlington, Texas, USA - FEB 1, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Can from my local Walgreens. On sale - a sixer for only $2.70! Pour is the palest, clearest, cleanest, and most crisp yellow that I have ever seen. I could literally read a book through this beer. Big white head. Aroma is sweet, a little spicy, and almost nonexistent. As it warms, it gets worse. Taste is also almost non existent. As it warms, I can actually find a little hop bitterness and it’s almost pleasing. Until hit with an immense corn bread must.
Appearance definitely deserves a 5.