michael-pollack (4960) - King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 27, 2004
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Draught: Dark brown color. Clear. Average, lasting, creamy, light brown head. Good lacing. Choclate, coffee, toffee, toasted, roasted malts. Light leather taste. Medium body but very thin texture. Soft carbination. Chalky bitter finish. VERY THIN.
Terminus (3349) - Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA - AUG 15, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
tap at littleton, colorado location-pours deep brown hue with minimal off-white head. light chocolate and roasted aroma. flavors are not very strong and lacks a good body.
JPDIPSO (5107) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 15, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Draft- Spokane. Dark brown color with a smaller light tan head. Light coffee and roasted amlt aromas. Sharp black malt and burnt caramel flavors.
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - JUL 14, 2004
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
This porter has a moderate roast followed by sweet chocolate; full flavored, but not thick bodied. The main thing holding it back is that the sweetness dominates - more roast please! On tap in Broomfield, CO.
beerinmarch (2830) - Washington, USA - JUN 30, 2004
3.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pours a deep brown, almost black color with a small off-white head. Very roasty chocolate aroma that was quite impressive, if only the taste could have backed it up this would have been a great brew. Taste was kinda thin and the sweetness was really hidden and only a faint roastyness could be found, almost watered down. Slightly bitter end, an ok porter by smell, but kinda let down by the taste.
burgerlicious (308) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - JUN 28, 2004
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
The body was black with a tan head. The taste was what I describe as a medium-intensity porter flavor. In other words, there are better porters out there but there are ones that are worse too.
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - JUN 14, 2004
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
From the commercial description - "Many people who normally donít drink dark beers will drink this beer."
I can see why. Itís thin and watery, without much of a "dark" flavor (or any other flavor...) It does have a BIT of roasty undertones, just a bit - but it reminds me of some emasculated Utah brew more than anything else. The appearance is bad for a porter, it does not have much in the way of head or lacing.
The last of a very unremarkable tasting of Big Horn brews. Not a recommended brewery in my book.
rkearney (35) - Amherst, New York, USA - MAR 9, 2004
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
This was the second time I had this beer, but first time rating it. Id have to say the first time I had it, It left a better impression, possibly just the tap that day. So I gave it the benefit of the doubt, and combined my memory and current rating.
Semi sweet chocolate nose, medium body with a slight bitter finish.
thedm (5140) - Fort Wayne, USA - MAR 4, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This draft brew from the brewery in Indianapolis poured a small head of mostly diminishing finely sized brown colored bubbles the left behind a good lace. The body was an opaque dark brown color. The aroma was mild with malt and molasses notes. The mouth feel was smooth and flat. The flavor was mild malty and brown beer like.
hotstuff (4403) - Indiana, USA - FEB 23, 2004
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
On tap at the Ram in downtown Indianapolis. This beer formed a small sized tan head with fine sized bubbles that completely diminished. The body was opaque and uncarbonated with a reddish-brown hue. The nose was chocolate and coffee and malt. The flavor was coffee with a smooth mouthfeel. The texture was watery and thin. The lacing was very sparse.