JohnC (3000) - Mission Viejo, California, USA - MAR 29, 2005
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I guess that I could repeat what Cheri said, it’s for the BMC crowd, not bad, but not worth the trouble.
Cashazza (217) - Morganville, Maryland, USA - FEB 2, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
A standard light beer made for the BMC crowd going to Big River. Some malt in there and not too bad but its pretty light and watery. Pass on it
ElGaucho (2240) - Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA - JAN 10, 2005
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 12/20
No aroma. Pale yellow in color. Little head. Good lace. Diacetyl notes. Could pass for a blonde ale. Not bad. Fresh. Crisp. Light hops. No flaws.
punkeedo (498) - Covington, Louisiana, USA - NOV 6, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Atlanta. On tap at Rock Bottom Restaurant and Brewery in Buckhead. Hmm...how to describe this? Corn. Corn, corn, and more corn. I can see an appeal to this beer, as it seems a bit tastier than most light beers. But then, it tastes like corn. Strongly of corn. A nice brew, it looks quite pale with not mcuh head and is better as it warms. If you like light brews, check this out. It’s not bad....just corny.
freekyp (1537) - Thomasville, North Carolina, USA - OCT 24, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JUL 3, 2009 Disney Boardwalk. On Tap. I always find it hard to get excited for a lite beer, but the Florida heat on this day was oppresive, and something quenching and uncomplicated was on the menu. Light wheaty nose with subtle breadiness balanced the floral lightly hopped body. Thin and smooth with a slightly dry finish, this is a decent, if not exceptional beer. Certainly better then anything else you can get at Disney beer-wise.
MMM...Beer (385) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - SEP 4, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
-Aroma: Strong yeast smell with a hint of fruity
-Appearance: Very pale even for a pale lager
-Flavor: (see aroam) very yeasty
-Palate: Simply smooth and refreshing.
Nothing out-of-this-world but still a clean, refreshing brew
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - AUG 8, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
on tap @ chattanooga. Light watery appearance, with a little bit of head. Musty damp cardboard aroma, with a flavor that I think if I may quote myself, just sucks. Bitter beer face alert.
PorterPounder (5699) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAY 30, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: JAN 16, 2007 On tap at the Chattanooga location. Light pale golden appearance, little to no head; bit of a wet paper bag aroma. Has a tad bit of a sweet honey flavor to it, otherwise typical lager flavor. About par for a brewpub light - brewed for the masses.
Earlier Rating: 10/7/2003 Total Score: 2.4 Combined on 1/16/07 Had on tap at the brewpub in Jacksonville. Had a very light golden, pale appearance with a light white head. Has that patented wet paper bag aroma. There is not a whole lot going on here - pretty waterery with a brief hint of hop bitterness in the aftertaste. Probably the least favorite of the sample.
wunderbier (1434) - Tampere, FINLAND - APR 18, 2004
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pale gold body. Straw aroma with a light, piney hint of hops. Lightly sweet flavor becomes a very-lightly bitter finish. Grainy finish. Lightly body, watery texture, fizzy carbonation. The bottom line is: at least I only had to drink 4 ounces of this stuff.
Drinker101 (54) - East Ridge, Tennessee, USA - APR 18, 2004
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not very impressed. Very light color same as vegetable oil. Aroma was weak. Taste was defintely light due to there really wasn't much taste at all.