bluemeow76 (693) - Lewis Center, Ohio, USA - DEC 9, 2003
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours a light gold with a thin white head. No lacing. Aroma is hoppy. Typical of a light beer. This is good for a light, but still not good for a beer.
joet (2043) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - OCT 29, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
yuck. adjuncty, fruity, there's nothing right about this. by bjcp I suppose all this fits under the crappy definition but this is bad. fizzy and bland. a beer only a coors light lover could love
jgb9348 (4440) - Arlington (Pentagon City), Virginia, USA - OCT 3, 2003
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Real light yellow colour, looks like pee with a thin-white head. A bit of malt and metal in the aroma. Light-bodied; Some malt in the flavour, but not much. Overall, not great, but better than some other lights. I had this on draught at Big River (owned by Gordon Biercsh) in Chattanooga, Tennesse on 26-September-2003.
haddon90 (1374) - Denver, Colorado, USA - SEP 29, 2003
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Very light and clear with not much head. No aroma and the flavor is of some malt but not much hops. Really light.
Shag (2546) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - SEP 4, 2003
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: DEC 19, 2003 Better than your typical light lager. Decent head with a golden appearance. Flavor is smooth with no hops present and some malt. No reason to go after this considering the other quality beers this brewery offers. A good light summer beer. Head of the class in a class full of students on the small bus.
aracauna (2985) - Georgia, USA - AUG 2, 2003
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Surprising bit of malt flavor. The color is extremely pale, but the head has a great bit of fullness and retention which saves the appearance score. No hops as expected, Slightly citric nose. For a light lager, this is good.
TheBeerCollector (633) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - JUN 28, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
My least favorite offering from this establishment. Obviously brewed for the Bud drinking masses. Quite bland and boring. The bartender said that this was their best seller.
JMerritt (1735) - Macomb, Illinois, USA - MAY 29, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Sampled at the brewpub at Walt Disney World's Boardwalk. Corn flavor and aroma. Much more flavorful than Bud Light. Actually a quite decent light beer.
Dogbrick (7123) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - MAY 27, 2003
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Part of a sampler: Pours a light gold with a thin white head. No lacing. Light hops aroma. Light bodied, with the typical brewpub "light lager" taste. Minimal hops flavor and somewhat fizzy. Light and crisp finish. Okay for what it is.
Aurelius (3850) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAR 27, 2003
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pale gold. Mild, yeasty aroma. Bready and very mildly hopped. Nice CO2 bite, though. Medium finish, sturdy palate for a lite. OK fare.
Earlier Rating: 1/26/2003 Total Score: 3
Very pale, could have used more carbo. Doughy aroma. Good American Standard style hopping. On the watery side, perhaps and slightly sweet.