Tmoney99 (13334) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - SEP 8, 2005
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Draft sampler at BRB. Dark amber with a moderate white head that diminished slowly. Moderate balanced aroma. Medium body with a smooth texture. Moderate balanced hoppy sweet flavor with a medium finish.
beeryum (652) - Norcross, Georgia, USA - JUN 20, 2005
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Draft, light copper. I got a malty aroma on this. Beer was thin but malty, and hints of subdued spicy hops. Slightly bitter finish, and decent mouthfeel. I felt this was one of their better beers I had, behind the stout and IPA.
BeerandBlues2 (12045) - Escondido, California, USA - JUN 14, 2005
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Tap. Yeast and fragrant floral hop aroma. Pours bronze with a thin white head. sour hop flavor with a creamy yeast and malt body. Medium bodied and creamy palate.
LilKem (1213) - Marietta, Ohio, USA - APR 3, 2005
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
i disliked this one. on tap. o.k. looking-- amber in color with light head. flavor didnt come through as much as it should
JohnC (3004) - Mission Viejo, California, USA - MAR 29, 2005
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Nice amber color with malty aroma and flavor, this was a pretty nice brew. it’s a decent example of a vienna
SpringsLicker (3430) - Tennessee, USA - MAR 21, 2005
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
On tap at the bar at the brewery.
Beautiful looking beer, ample head, clear bright amber color.
Decent but subdued malt aroma. The flavor was scaled back a bit too, but this was one of the better ones I’ve had from there so far. Just needs a bit more body and flavor to suit me.
brentfeesh (1208) - Mansfield, Ohio, USA - JAN 17, 2005
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JAN 28, 2005 Had on tap at the brewery (1/05). Nothing very special about this beer, but I did think it was one of their better styles (I’m a pale ale drinker and I did not like their pale ale attempts). I could not detect much aroma but what I did note was nice and malty. I found the beer to malty as well as crisp and well balanced.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - AUG 8, 2004
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Sweet malty nutty flavors. Very smooth and easy to drink. A good session beer.
PorterPounder (7224) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAY 30, 2004
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Had on tap at the Chattanooga location. Dark golden appearance, good sized head. Sweet, malty aroma. Has a slight nutty taste to it. Very smooth mouthfeel, quite pleasant to say the least. Above average for a brewpub lager.
Cashazza (217) - Morganville, Maryland, USA - APR 20, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
This beer was the only one offered at a ball game other than BMC, and for the same price, I was in for a treat! Orange, wonderful aroma -- floral. Nicely hopped with a citrusy and malty finish.