3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 presario (4133) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - SEP 9, 2002
UPDATED: APR 2, 2004 Still not sure why they changed the name to Cream Ale. Tastes the same. A more complex taste than its brother Traditional Ale from Big Rock. Still not as complex as the more famous members of the Brown Ale family. Another better than average beer from Big Rock.
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20 uglybastard (101) - Riverside, California, USA - AUG 27, 2002
Small creamy head atop a nice copper colored brew. Smells of fruit, hard candy. Slight hoppy bit to it around the tongue. Bit of malty sweetness, caramel flavors, perhaps. This is a beer that has absolutely no flavor when it’s too cold. Definately have to let this one warm up a bit.
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20 labattblueleaf (225) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - AUG 5, 2002
Distinct nutty finish. Great looking bottle. Kind of like an American Standard with a little extra.
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 DougShoemaker (3149) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 8, 2002
Sweet sugar aroma, copper colour, creamy vanilla head. Very mild malt flavour, good balance of bitterness. Quite smooth, a nice ale.
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 MarshallMac (143) - West Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 2, 2002
A decent brew, had this one in deep cove for the first time, I’ liked it. Nothing out of the ordinary
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 AxeMaster221 (343) - Portland, Oregon, USA - APR 12, 2002
Not a lot going on here, fairly bland and a touch watery. If you are going to drink a bland mediocre beer, you can find one that costs less.
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 LuckeyHaskins99 (180) - Toledo, Ohio, USA - FEB 17, 2002
Pretty crappy taste. I like brown ales done well, but this one was not. Had a 12 on a fishing trip in canada, and was not too impressed. Sleeman’s is a better, though less interesting choice.
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20 Kaya161 (1128) - San Diego, California, USA - JAN 23, 2002
Farily bland, but decent smooth malty and perfumey.
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 omhper (15956) - Stockholm, SWEDEN - JAN 4, 2002
Pale nut brown. Light bodied, sweet, hint of late bitterness. OK as a session beer.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 joet (1875) - Fulton, California, USA - DEC 26, 2001
Nothing there and a wee bit of something nasty. Thin. Are there macro adjuncts here?
|