SynergyXJ (510) - Blacksburg, Virginia, USA - DEC 26, 2006
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle Nothing special. Doesn’t taste exactly like Heineken, but okay. Probably wouldn’t drink again.
b33r (835) - Cleveland, Ohio, USA - DEC 16, 2006
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: JUL 11, 2008 okay, got in a bottle at the bar. Taste was average, can’t pick out anything particular about it, but still okay.
TomDecapolis (4618) - Milton, Delaware, USA - DEC 12, 2006
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours a translucent golden yellow with a smaller white bubbly/foamy head. Aroma was grassy, citrusy and fruity. Flavor of corn, some malty sweetness, very slight traces of hop bitterness, thin and watery with some tingling carbonation.
mnurda (1239) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - DEC 11, 2006
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
I was a bit surprised to see how low this one was rated. I quite liked it. Had it a few times last week at home and at Mona Lisa’s. Went very well with the Italian Food at Mona Lisa’s
beerlady (556) - lucerne, SWITZERLAND - DEC 10, 2006
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
almoust no head,dissapears speedy
smells like bread, malt,even a bit of hidden rotten eggs
tasts not so malty-sweetish than other beers of that kind,some sourness,malt
aftertaste first a little,little moment of hidden floral hint,thensomebitterness
not very special
AmazonMatt (285) - PANAMA - DEC 4, 2006
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Poured a light gold with lots of bubbles and a head that wa quickly gone. Probably the last new beer for some time here in Panama. Better than Panama beer, but the third ingredient is corn, so we’re not talking quality here.
LinusStick (3201) - Moon Twp, suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 3, 2006
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Not bad for a lager. Much better than its American counterparts. The aroma was awful like dead wheat. The light gold color looked a lot like a Budweiser but without the head. Perhaps the guy on the front of the beer had it whacked. The taste was that of a typical pale lager from here but with a lot more carbonation which gave it more bite and allowed it to sit longer without getting flat. Not bad for this type of beer but I was hoping for better from the country my ancestors came from. I want to grab the guy on the front, kiss him, and say, "You broke my heart Birra"
DanBerg (59) - Alkmaar, NETHERLANDS - DEC 1, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Very standard beer. Tastes a bit metallic but the aftertaste is fine. What can I say about this beer? It’s not a bad lager, but not very good either.
beerbill (3605) - Laurel, New York, USA - DEC 1, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
On tap. Poured a clear gold with a thin head that lasted for about half the glass. Very light aroma of malt. Pretty bland in the flavor department. Some malt, some hops and a light background earthiness. Certainly not worth paying extra for.
LyndaNova (532) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - NOV 29, 2006
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Cold 12oz bottle: Pours a clear light golden color with a layer of fluffy alabaster bubbles that mostly dissolve. Aroma and taste are of light sweet malts and subtle tangy hops with a hint of lemon. Light bodied, smooth and well carbonated.