Ibrew2or3 (8024) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - NOV 27, 2006
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Clear golden color with off white head. Aroma is light with pale malts and a tangy hoppiness. Taste has medium to high carbonation that allows the hops to bite with a little more passion. Pale-grainy malts mix well with the hops. The hop flavor strengthens and grows right to the point of being metallic. Decent lawnmower beer.
HarryFlashman (469) - Chatham, Kent, ENGLAND - NOV 27, 2006
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pretty fair, a bit darker and more hoppy than Peroni, but not as smooth. Also, marked down for coming in a silly brown bottle and having a stupid old duffer in a hat on the label.
Nejhleader (1431) - Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 25, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
not all that great. Tastes like your average lager, body seemed a tad bit thin.
GeneralGao (3614) - Iowa City, Iowa, USA - NOV 22, 2006
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
12 oz bottle. Clear golden color with thin bubbly white head that didnít leave any lace. Light sprucy hop and grainy malt aroma and flavor. Pretty standard light lager.
adwoan99 (244) - Ft. Worth, Texas, USA - NOV 22, 2006
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Had this actually *in* Italy recently, but alas not on tap. I dunno if itís available that way. Anyway, not bad for a bland lager, no adjuncts, but basically just a plain lager. No nose to speak of, but taste is slightly hoppy. Palate is smooth, watery, very thin. Overall not bad, but give me a nice hearty ale.
brew4fun (209) - West Virginia, USA - NOV 21, 2006
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Golden pour with little head (may have been the rookie server). Virtually no flavor. As bland as it gets.
BeerHawk (1810) - Huntsville, Alabama, USA - NOV 19, 2006
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. Poured a golden color with a white head. The aroma was typical of a pale lager. The flavor found lemon and yeast. Light and just blah.
jason (1834) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 17, 2006
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Barely a aroma and a thin pour left this to be sitting flat in my glass. Flavor is decently balanced but lacks of any real flavor. Not too bad of a beer but not really worth trying again.
StueyD (1564) - Heacham, Norfolk, ENGLAND - NOV 14, 2006
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A pale yellow coloured beer, fizzy, with a frothy white head. a metallic hop nose, slightly zesty. The taste is dry, a mild metallic hop flavour that becomes dull as the beer warms up. This has to be served well chilled to be anything like drinkable! A typical example of mass produced ďB.Y.L. - Boring Yellow Liquid!Ē (Bottle - Prezzo restaurant, Kingís Lynn, Norfolk).
Slacks (615) - Bolton, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 13, 2006
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle: My candidate in the election lost tonight, I didnít deserve anything better. Pours yellow, carbonated, head-free. Aroma is almost non-existent.. it is my belief it once stood near a malt or two and the scent has clung to its jacket. Flavour is notably corn free, but so pale and bland Iíve forgotten it already. So Iíll just make it up.. it.. umm.. itís "notably bland". Yes, thatís it. Notably bland.