0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 collieman (191) - montreal, - AUG 4, 2005
didn’t get drunk, got sick. Drink spoiled milk instead, it tastes better. Sweet corn alcohol every were, nose, palat and taste. Garbage. GARBAGE. Tasted 1 sip, poured it out.
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 pintbypint (1610) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - MAY 8, 2012
1.18L clear bottle with screw off cap. Bright yellow colour, surprisingly large white head with a bunch of lacing, when it settles it still retains a nice foamy layer. Nose has a bit of orange, rough grains, cardboard, some fusel notes, not as harsh as I was expecting. Taste is sweet, again orangey, lots of harsh grains. Dryish finish, papery, some grain, lingering alcohol. Body is medium, even carbonation. Definately loses it’s charm as it warms, this is to be consumed as cold as you can make it. A total mess overall, but honestly I’ve had way worse than this, in the style and otherwise. A shaker and a half of this brew went down pretty easy, but I might just have a drinking problem.
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 reebtogi (2161) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - FEB 10, 2012
1.18L bottle pours a pale golden color with a small white head that leaves no lacing. Aroma is skunk and grassy hops. Taste is skunky with a light malty sweetness and terrible hop bitterness. One of the worst beers ever made imho.
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 Cirrhosis (931) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - JUN 11, 2009
Beer #5 in the 40oz. head to head taste off. it sucks and that’s all you got to know but I guess here are some reasons it sucks. This was the same as the other four only worse (corn, rice, sweet, chemical) it was way more harsh and burnt the throat on the way down. You get what you pay for, how is it even possible for this to be this cheap bottled water cost more and why do all these shyt beers come from Wisconsin.
3.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20 hazer772 (18) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 28, 2008
Was a good all around malt liquor but will always remind me of my 1/2 brother, he bought a case of 40’s and was over gone, slammed the 40 to the ground on concrete and didn’t let go...blood every where...sadly this beer is gone..a victim of Ontario law
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 RobBestwick (583) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - APR 16, 2007
1.18l bottle. Strong malty aroma. Pours with a light golden hue and an average white head. Incredibly strong and sickly gasoline like flavour, quite thick with a horrible finish. Drain pour material.
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20 jason69 (27) - CANADA - FEB 28, 2007
its a decent 40 of malt liquor, ive had much worse, it is really effective in gettin the job done if you seek intoxication and are on a budget, but its no extra gold or colt 45, But must give props to the awesome label
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 MrManning (1945) - London, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 8, 2007
A poor representation of a style that is poor poor to begin with. The fusels and orange rind nastiness are awash with boozey adjuncts. This stuff is not even good enough for the bums who are supposed to drink it.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 iambeer (255) - Ontario, CANADA - APR 27, 2005
I’ve done it I’ve foud a malt I like less then O.E, this is it, sleeman is trying to disassociate itself with this by calling itself the silver creek brewery? This stuff isn’t even a good bag beer.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 paco (527) - Regina, Saskatchewan, CANADA - MAR 24, 2005
Complete waste of $5. There is no way anyone can actually enjoy this. If all you want is to get drunk for cheap then this is the way to go.
|