2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 Cirrhosis (887) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - JUN 5, 2009
Golden yellow body with a thin white cap produced during the poor but was gone in just a few seconds, just looks like you everyday average beer. Weak smelling malts, and wow after the first sniff all sent has disappeared nothing can be detected, but at least no smell is better then a bad one. Old tasting beer, all malt kinda stale, some chemicals, with a massive bread after taste. It’s a drinkable beer nothing great, and since I got for free it was worth the money
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 Sammy (5885) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 8, 2008
A real macro lager. Pale fizzy yellow. A bit of dot lace on a huge white head of malt foam. Horrible smell, wafting throughout office like I was a homeless person. I may have to toss this glass. Dry lower than average mouthfeel. Corny taste. Dry aftertaste. Four ounces was enough to drink. Thanks though anyways Mark for the beers from Newfoundland.
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 MrManning (1942) - London, Ontario, CANADA - APR 2, 2008
Thanks to my sister for this beer. Pours a pale sparkling gold, leaving behind a white fizz with some lace. Faint fruity nose with some grainy/bread and pale malts. Breads and grains in the flavour profile with a slight infusion of hops and fruit. Not all that great, but decent for a macro pale. Decent slightly bitter lingering finish.
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 albert007 (414) - Penobsquis, New Brunswick, CANADA - OCT 13, 2007
Black Arse. Yum! Pale golden, fizzy, corn. Flavor is corny liquor with a tinge of bitterness. Gassy, but very drinkable from the can in a Zodiac fishing on the Churchill river in Labrador.
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 fro2218 (466) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - OCT 1, 2007
Blah. Some rotten malt flavors. This is not really drinkable. It should have stayed in Canada.
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20 adwoan99 (244) - Ft. Worth, Texas, USA - NOV 22, 2006
Brother brought it back from Newfoundland for me, so I gotta give it an extra point or two for sentimental reasons. Very little nose, appearance, pour, head all like every other bland lager. Taste, well... what little is there isn’t *horrible* but still lacks even the most basic qualities that make it a beer. I wish I could say more, but well, there’s not much else to say. Blegh.
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 pootzboy (1284) - Hawgville, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 1, 2006
Hey an east coast macro that’s all malt!! Still has macro blandness but a passable quaff with a bucket of mussels.
Pale gold smallish white cap stays as a surface lace some lace on the glass.
Aroma of grains and sweetness.
Mild dose of sweet malts up front attenuated hops ride in the back until the finish where a surprising light burst of nobel hops cut the sweet bready taste.
A fair macro lager...probably the best of the few all grain macro lagers in the east.
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20 Eructoblaster (2043) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - JUN 27, 2006
Can - 355ml, brewed in St. John’s, NFLD. Pale blond body topped with a thin white creamy head. Boring malty/hoppy aroma with some corny notes. Taste is weak and lacks complexity. It carries thin bready notes. It ends with a short bitter finish. Useless.
|