REDDOGICE (188), nantucket, Massachusetts, USA Jan 3, 2006 Not good by anyone’s standards. Thats why they call it Blatz. Golden, typical lager color. This is also typical of Pabst Products. Avoid, especially if you like good beer.
jbuzz (566), South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA May 13, 2008 For a big light it is OK. Watery as you’d expect from this type of product. But not the lousiest thing I have drank. SavageElvis (131), Savage, Minnesota, USA Nov 2, 2007 The typical light golden color with a little head. Terse in flavor which makes it way too light and boring. There are good light beers out there but this is not one of them. duffman9908 (8), USA does not count Oct 6, 2007 Not quite as good as Blatz original. Watered down Blatz flavor, better than most light beers at similar price level. cheapdark (1651), Monacatootha, Pennsylvania, USA Jun 15, 2007 Not a memory rate, I drink as I think. Little sister of my well known friend blatz. Funny name huh? Sweet aroma with possibly a little cream corn, but not much. Possibly strong ale or a little malt liquor like on the smell. Ubiquitous pale yellow american color, what else? Friendly introductory taste. Mannered and well behaved, no offensive bite or bitterness. Not quite as good as Schmidts, old german or Carlesburgh. Much better than city lager or city ice. This is overall a good session brew, very repeatable for at least one session or a couple of yards. Skyview (3060), Papoose Jct., Minnesota, USA May 27, 2007 They still package this swill? Talk about your macro-brewery milking an old brand’s reputation to death, this one should have been retired decades ago. Pours a near water honey hue, with no head. Aroma of soggy corn flakes in water (try it if you are curious) and some barnyard hay. Taste is nearly as clean as water. No aftertaste. C’mon Pabst/SABMiller, it’s time to allow this one to fade into history.
|