jujuparijs (22) - USA - APR 10, 2005
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Esther: tres fruity and dry, je la rachetrai bien volontiers...
Juju: ben arome laisse presumer un bon gout caramel helas il ny est pas en bouche par contre elle tres plaisante et pour le prix un bon rapport qualite prix
6$ pour le pack de 6 a Safeway
GrandpaSteve (10) - Downingtown, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 9, 2005
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Did not really have any taste - the aroma was good, but the flavor was neutral. Not offensive, but not worth seeking out.
ABUSEDGOAT (2419) - California, USA - APR 9, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: DEC 9, 2005 So yeah. I used to like this. Then I tried like 10 other beers in the style and saw a lot of flaws. Itís a nice cloudy golden body, but after that itís downhill. Weak Wit aroma with plastic and other junk. Flavor is the same making this a pretty pathetic Wit.
Oakes (13860) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - APR 7, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Cloudy tan colour. Might be the ugliest wit Iíve ever seen, at least amongst unfiltered ones. Filtered ones are so much more heinous. Aroma shows a little curacao and some sweaty yeast notes that remind of suntan lotion. In short, it smells like a pleasant afternoon in Aruba. The tastes is remarkably similar with phenolic curacao and yeast sweat intermingling under a blanket of dull, plodding malts. Because this beer is every bit as uncool as mixing metaphors, it is like a bad karaoke version of a really good song.
BeerRunner (144) - San Diego, California, USA - APR 7, 2005
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
This is an *excellent* Witbier! I was quite surprized at just how good it was. As is typical of the beer snobs, since this is brewed by some obscure American brewery in Tennessee, it gets a paultry rating...but such is the way things are in the extreme snobbery of the beer world (thank God weíre not in the WINE world where the snobber is even more frickiní disgusting!)
Anyway, bottom line, this is a very fine Belgian White.
TheRimmer (483) - Florida, USA - APR 4, 2005
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
Stinks like the U.S. mint. Gives way to bread, grain, citrus. The taste is slightly metallic with yeast and some zest. This really could be worse.
schocha610 (2) - Pennsylvania, USA - APR 4, 2005 does not count
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
An excellent choice. It has a crisp taste with a better than average aftertaste. I believe it to be better with the addition of a slice of orange. Better on tap than in the bottle. Very affordable, which being a college guy, price is definitely included in a beer rating.
fordest (2135) - Santee/San Diego, California, USA - APR 4, 2005
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Draft at Lake Powell Lodge. Cloudy yellow. Does that really say owned by Coors? Not a bad drink at all.
richlikebeer (838) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 3, 2005
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
not quite up to par against some of the witbiers i have had recently. didnt bring alot to the table in terms of aroma, just a slight sweetness. was much cloudier and yellowish than i consider spec. the flavor was also rather bland in comparison to hoegarden or victory. it did have a very crisp mouthfeel and an easy drinkability, but overall, i think this was a downgraded version of the family for the mainstream crowd.
mjg74 (2910) - La Mesa, California, USA - APR 2, 2005
3.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours a hazy orange/yellow color. Lots of sediment floating around. Aroma is sweet and slightly yeasty. Some orange peel aroma as well. Taste is somewhat sweet and grainy. Some fruitiness as well. Enjoyable.