hershiser2 (1227) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - FEB 2, 2004
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Appearance: cloudy golden (like apple cider) with decent head that seemed to last a bit.
Smell: strange, at first reminded me of soap... then the scent kicked in: the smell was that of one of those urinal "breath mints."
Taste: tasted just like it smelled, but not really soapy. Instead, floraly, and fruity. Better than average taste, since it's kinda strange, but definitely not something I'd drink more than one at a time.
Mouthfeel: not bad... feels like it tastes and smells.
Drinkability: One is drinkable, two is not. This is a one-a-night beer. More than that would upset the stomach, as it's too fruity and filling (or maybe after awhile the constant smell of the urinal "breath mint" would send you gagging.)
firemedic713 (169) - Palm Bay, Florida, USA - FEB 2, 2004
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Yellowish slight haze. Medium-light body with mild bitterness. Tropical fruit aromas. This seems to have significant amounts of citrus flavoring. Clean finish with mild floral hop notes. Certainly the best beer that Coors makes but still not great.
brownaler (378) - Topsail Beach, North Carolina, USA - FEB 2, 2004
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
A bit a coriander and orange flavor, but that is about it. Another one of those beers that college students think is the best beer in the world.
pintocb (645) - Darsville, Georgia, USA - JAN 31, 2004
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: JAN 25, 2007 Considering it is made in a macro this is not a bad beer. Blue Moon was my first experience with a wheat, and while I’ve since found that the true Belgian beers are better this one will do in a pinch.
Axle3380 (95) - montvale, New Jersey, USA - JAN 31, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
One of the worst Belgian ales I've ever tasted.....not impressed. Not as bitter as a belgian ale should be, but then again it's coors...so that speaks for itself
jollyraider (252) - Los Angeles, California, USA - JAN 28, 2004
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
God, if more college students knew about this stuff.... The world would be a better place.
AleDrinker (1089) - Sunnyvale, California, USA - JAN 28, 2004
3.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Coors actually made a beer that has nuances of true witbier. I'm impressed. Nice yeasty nose and flavor. Plenty of malt. I'm a fan. Thick ole head, medium bodied.
supermikeyb (43) - Fort Worth, Texas, USA - JAN 27, 2004
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
This is what people rave about??? This beer is confused as to what it is trying to be. Its got WAY to much coriander, not enough orange. Not enough wheat, lots of froth. Coors really needs to re-think this one....
BeerSurfer (27) - Powell, Ohio, USA - JAN 25, 2004
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
(Bottle) Preface: I know zilch about Witbier. That being said, I like the malt and citrus aroma, not so wild about the hazy gold color, but it sounds like that is the trait of a witbier. The foamy head is very light and dissipates quickly, leaving almost no lacing. The flavor is OK- cardamon? is interesting, I like the wheaty aftertaste, even though I prefer a little more hops "bite" than this provides, but again, I'm not sure that's expected of a witbier. I'd have to be in the mood for this, but I'd drink it again. This is good enough to make me try some "true" Belgian Whites.
SledgeJr (3577) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - JAN 25, 2004
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This is no Celis, but pleasant for a Coors product. It is even better when you can find it on tap.