Eyedrinkale (3213) - Astoria, New York, USA - MAR 5, 2004
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: JUL 2, 2004 OK, so it's not Hoegaarden. we know this. But it's not that bad. I had it served with an orange by a few HOT promo girls. Yeah that makes it go down a little easier. Not a bad Coors beer for what it is.
Re-rate July June 30, 2004. This is total drainpour. So the server wasn't as hot as last time but the beer sucked hard. Who actually goes out and buys this swill?
jcc83 (137) - Athens, Georgia, USA - MAR 3, 2004
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
An interesting experience. Poured a thick, hazy, orange that reminded me of pineapple juice. Solid particles danced around in streams of carbonation under a bubbly white head. Aroma was crisp, spicy, and rather fruity. This led me to expect a sweet, fruity flavor, but I was pleasantly surprised by a thick, wheaty flavor that was quite enjoyable. A light palate, but one that accompanied the flavor well. This beer was different than any others I've tried, and I enjoyed the experience.
TheBeerGod (5572) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - MAR 1, 2004
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Not bad! Pours a cloudy orange blond with a medium white head. Nose is spice, wheat, and light notes of fruit. Definite spice, and yeast along with more wheat on the tongue. The finish seemed to lean on the sweeter, fruitier than expected side. Very good for a macro brewed beer.
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - FEB 24, 2004
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
I've lived in Colorado for three years now and this is the first time that I have tried this beer. And I like it! There's nothing here to jump out and grab you, but it has a clean, pleasant taste and is thirst quenching. Nothing wrong with that!
axilla (962) - New Providence, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 24, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JUL 18, 2005 This murky, orange/brown beer smells a lot like brown sugar. Sweet orange taset followed with a yeasty brown sugar aftertaste. A bit better than I remember. There’s a bar in Lancaster that serves these poured over an orange slice which is pretty good, too.
archstanton (105) - mukilteo, Washington, USA - FEB 17, 2004
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 18/20
UPDATED: FEB 22, 2004 i agree with other people this is kinda fruity and has a hint of spice its very mild tasting its a very light beer but good with mexican food
rabuc (143) - carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 16, 2004
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
this beer poured cloudy yellow with thin white head. i didn't detect much of aroma. the taste was a weak mix of spice and fruit. this is an ok beer, slightly better than most of the tasteless big name macro-brews.
dwyerpg (4874) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - FEB 10, 2004
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
smell alternates between decent fruity and plain rank. murky yellow-orange. however, taste is enjoyable, and unique.
YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - FEB 6, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Saw it in Michael Jakson's Untimate Beer book and thought, why not? Bad. Nothing to commend itself.
MrBeer (276) - Erie, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 4, 2004
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Blue Moon had a very nice flavor and the aftertaste was a nice sweet but not too sweet taste. I would defienlty get this again.