Dean1015 (9) - san francisco, California, USA - MAR 4, 2011
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
i was a sucker and paid 8.99 for this only because i used to be a fan of blue moon till my palate became more complex. aroma is simple spice and alchohol. taste is bland a little spice and orange peel and a lingering alchohol aftertaste. It just seems they put more alchohol and thickened thier regular version of blue moon which dosent make for a good beer, especially at 8.99
rubbishystuff (1899) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - DEC 26, 2014
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: JAN 20, 2015 Well, I get what they were going for but waaay too sweet. It clouded everything else. More of an imperial version of the regular blue moon. Serving: Bottle
slowrunner77 (6160) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 3, 2014
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
"every once and a while, a beer is exactly like you think it will be. this is one of those times. this is blue moon, slightly stronger, sweeter, deeper, and better. nothing more, nothing less. not worth $9, but i wasn’t payin."
generallee08 (717) - New York, USA - JUL 12, 2014
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
The body has a pale hazy orange tan color with a small white head. The head fades out quickly leaving nothing behind and making no lacing at all. Inside the body there are a few small deposits of yeast floating around. The aroma is quite fruity. It has a heavy orange like character with notes of orange blossom and mandarin orange peel. Under this are decent sweet bready and wheaty notes. There is defiantly a lot fruity orange and yeast character here. I get this fruity pebbles cereal thing with notes of bready yeast, wheat malt and a warm alcohol presence. It is sweet overall with just a little leafy hop bitterness towards the finish. The palate has a smooth, slick and heavy feel with very soft carbonation.
ChetManly (1) - Indiana, USA - FEB 21, 2014 does not count
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
2009. First aged Grand Cru I have had. Overall, a really solid beer. Better than the average Blue Moon.
DocLock (8086) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 7, 2014
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bomber from Capone’s. Pours dark straw with fizzy body. Tastes mildly fruity and hopcitric, with notes of tangerine, but falls apart in the palate department, and is a mess.
subsonic (82) - Pataskala, Ohio, USA - DEC 27, 2013
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
"pours a cloudy yellow in color and has a high amount of visible carbonation with a very small bright white head that died down rather quickly, and a thick ring around the edge of the glass. The aroma was light to moderately orange peel and nothing else. The taste was similar to the aroma and also has notes of coriander and wheat flavors; the spices particularly linger through the finish. The mouthfeel is medium bodied and has a moderate to high amount of carbonation. "
Mittenator (1439) - Michigan, USA - JUL 5, 2013
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bomber. Hazy bronze (lots of particulate) with a beige head. Malty sweet. Smells like schmirnof ice...really sweet and bad boozy at the end.
jkwalking05 (3971) - Arlington, Texas, USA - FEB 28, 2013
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Tasted in 2009 (backlog). Cloudy yellow with a decent white head. Aroma is grain, toffee, and caramel. Taste is the same.
Chad9976 (1269) - Albany, New York, USA - JAN 16, 2013
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
We all know the major macro breweries have been producing faux/"crafty" beers for a while now, but few have actually attempting anything resembling something "top shelf." Though Coors has with their Blue Moon line and has released several high alcohol brews in 750ml bottles. They’re even using the buzzword "vintage" now, like their Vintage Blonde Ale (with a 2012 date on it in case you want to cellar it). While not a horrible beer by any means, it’s simply lame, and I guess that’s the best we could hope for.
I received a 750ml bottle from a friend for Christmas (thanks, Ben!). I poured it into a tulip glass.
Appearance: Bright gold hue, crystal clear, plenty of visible carbonation. Forms a large, bright white, fizzy head that literally sizzles and fades away as quickly and completely as that of a macro adjunct lager (... the hell?) and leaves no lacing at all.
Smell: Surprisingly reminiscent of an adjunct lager with slight corn/cheap grain scent. Upon closer inspection I do detect some white grape aroma, but mostly it’s an unremarkable nose.
Taste: I would not assume Blue Moon Vintage Blonde Ale is intended for connoisseurs, but you definitely have to have a refined palate and a lot of patience to pick up the actual flavors present in this beer (allegedly). I let this beer warm up for a while and even at the cool (not cold) temperature, I was struggling to find any genuine taste here. My first impression of the taste was the same as my first impression of the nose - it’s surprisingly akin to an adjunct lager. They wouldn’t seriously be using corn or rice in a "Belgian Strong Pale Ale" would they?
By the way, what makes this beer "Belgian" in any way, shape or form, RateBeer? There is absolutely NO mention of Belgian yeast or other characteristics on the bottle or on the brewer’s website.
Anyway, the actual palate is rather bland and uneventful. The first few swigs are eerily similar to that of a clean pale lager. Once I get used to it, I start to notice that subtle chardonnay grape juice flavor a little more, though the wheat character is nowhere to be found. There is essentially no hop presence as all, but that shouldn’t be surprising considering it’s a whopping 2 IBUs according to Blue Moon’s website. There’s a bit of a metallic tang on the finish, but at least there’s no aftertaste. To the brewer’s credit they managed to mask the alcohol at least, so that’s a positive. Otherwise, there’s just nothing to appreciate about this beer other than its price tag (only $12 a CASE!). It would make an ideal transition beer for the hardcore BMC swiller, but otherwise it’s mostly inoffensive but certainly forgettable.
Drinkability: The only saving grace to Blue Moon Vintage Blonde Ale is that it’s highly drinkable. I don’t trust macro breweries with high ABV beers, but the 8.5% alcohol was invisible here in the nose, taste, and weight. The flat, thin mouthfeel makes it chuggable and smooth.
MadIndian (2454) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 27, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Again...another brew from them that falls flat. I guess you could almost call this a mild-mild thin Belgian.