jodyperkins (78) - Mississippi, USA - MAR 7, 2010
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not much to say - very corny aroma - light clear amber medium carbonation. Not much flavor.
DedicatedToFun (1595) - SoCal, California, USA - OCT 6, 2013
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Not awful but what can you expect from blue moon spin-offs, interesting wheat ale, trying to be a microbrew but cannot get away from BM.
Niko100 (1682) - Illinois, USA - JUN 4, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Nice amber/cider color; Light to medium body; Aroma of wheat, caramel, & some fruit; Flavor of sweet malt, wheat, caramel, some fruit, and lime; Decent overall.
leah2974 (445) - Georgia, USA - JAN 16, 2013
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours transparent. Spritzy aroma and flavor with no head. Slight citrus.
ads135 (2392) - Lawrence, Kansas, USA - DEC 16, 2012
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Sometimes, retirement is a good thing. Iím not sure what they made this out of, but it seems more like corn than wheat. The lime is unnecessary, or at least unnecessarily metallic.
jmagnus87 (2051) - Rockford, Illinois, USA - NOV 2, 2012
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
2010 vintage bottle from the back of my buddies "beer fridge"!! This did not age too badly. Typical skunky blue moon wheat with a little roses lime juice. Meh, it was probably much better fresh.
Apryde6226 (2) - - OCT 12, 2012 does not count
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
In the Kansas City area, this is not easily found. Very good for whatís turning into a mass produced product.
KickInChalice (860) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - FEB 23, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
From notes. First reviewed 5/2/2010. Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.
The head bubbles up to 3 cm as I pour it, but before I put the bottle down it is completely gone. Very pale golden amber color, with light visible carbonation rising in the glass.
Trying to find any real aroma here almost made me think I had a cold. There is just nothing there. Some subdued malt aroma, nothing related to lime or citrus.
Extremely processed sort of taste. More corn than malt flavor; what malt is there is of the pale variety. Lime shows up as it warms a little bit. Finishes sweet and chemically smooth.
Fizzy soda pop tingling sensation from the carbonation, but only a little bit crisp. Mostly watery in a light-to-medium body. Almost a chemical residue after each sip.
This was a very boring beer. I might adjust rankings if this was moved to the adjunct category, but as is, this is just not worth drinking.
deekyn (864) - San Francisco, California, USA - DEC 29, 2011
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
A - pours lazy deep yellow with some head.
S - simple aromas of wheat/grains and lime
M - light airy body with lively carbonation.
T- Simple wheat and lime combination. Clean and drinakble.
O - was the best of the blue moon offerings.
burg326 (2772) - Florida, USA - JUN 24, 2011
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
12 ounce bottle that pours amber in color. Has a sweet smell, tastes sweet as well. I know it is supposed to have lime leaves and lime peel in it, but I did not taste it, tasted like a sweeter blue moon.
nike (824) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 21, 2011
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not a bad wheat beer, just your typical Blue Moon taste. I didnít care for the lime finish, but the wheat was tasting.