boozedude (2190) - Des Moines, Iowa, USA - FEB 21, 2013
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours brownish red, white thin head, aroma of grape tasste is malts, and fruit., not bad at all
Majin (256) - West Des Moines, Iowa, USA - FEB 21, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle. Pale hop, nutty malt flavor. Not much on the tongue. Weak amber. Tasted more like a straight up pale. Good ABV though
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
tennessejed420 (927) - Denver, Colorado, USA - FEB 19, 2013
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
decided to get this only because it was a beer i had never had in a liquor store with sparse selection. Pours amber gold with fizzy off white head. Aroma of hay, light caramel. Medium to light bodied, high carbonation. Flavor is watery, light caramel and hay. Wouldnít have known there was wheat in it. Pretty bland and uninteresting, would rather have normal blue moon.
EdInSaltLake (727) - Salt Lake City, Utah, USA - FEB 19, 2013
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
Sweet, with some light caramel. Light fruitiness--smells and tastes more like green apple than oranges. Could probably use some more bitterness to balance the sweetness, which is dominant--although the flavor is not strong enough for it to be that offensive.
bagalagalaga (151) - Indiana, USA - FEB 17, 2013
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Actually better than standard Blue Moon, itís got a little orange flavor thrown in. The orange doesnít overpower it, itís a really smooth and refreshing beer. Also although itís treasonous to put an orange slice in your beer for flavor, itís somehow ok if itís oranged up in the bottle.
lobotomizdgoat (18) - California, USA - FEB 16, 2013
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A: fruity undertones - orange and banana, some yeast spices
T: sweet malts - somewhat bock-like,
P: nothing special
O: A good beer overall, but not particularly fancy. My guess is its rating would be considerable higher had everyone been told it was from <insert_popular_microbrewery>
Ernest (6729) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - FEB 15, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Head is initially small, frothy, white, mostly diminishing.
Body is medium amber.
Aroma is lightly malty (grain), lightly hoppy (flowers), with light notes of butter, orange juice, metal.
Flavor is moderately sweet, lightly acidic, lightly bitter.
Finish is lightly sweet, lightly acidic, lightly to moderately bitter.
Light to medium body, watery texture, lively carbonation.
Not much aroma, and whatís there is not healthy. Bland in the mouth. Drain pour.
Fatehunter (1647) - Corbett, Oregon, USA - FEB 14, 2013
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Almost a finger of head on a dark amber colored body.
The aroma is a mild grain and orange zest. Mild though.
The taste is mildly bitter with moderate sweetness. Bland.
The texture is crisp with moderate to high carbonation.
A lack of depth and flavor keeps this back.
Block (1706) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - FEB 13, 2013
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
This is the worst beer by Blue Moon I have ever had. I wouldnít be able to tell the difference between this and what I drank in college (and occasionally still do).
Rotbart (155) - - FEB 13, 2013
2.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Nice orange, hoppy aroma, copper color with a rather full foamy head. It has a smooth hoppy flavor with a lightly caramel like finish.