1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 duff (5483) - St, Margarets, Greater London, ENGLAND - AUG 15, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 11, 2006 Bottle. Clean and crisp, with some slight metallic edges, thin, watery body. Pretty good as far as pale lagers go, but still nothing much going on.
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 Kaya161 (1128) - San Diego, California, USA - AUG 9, 2002
A half step above your typical mass market lager.
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 Jokes (1453) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUL 16, 2002
Another watery, boring American Standard. Slight notes of skunk are the only thing I could decipher. Not as premium as is claimed.
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20 MuddyFox99 (16) - Adelaide, AUSTRALIA - JUN 25, 2002
a bit watery, but aren’t all aussie ’premium’ beers? could do with more bitterness to finish but not too bad if you’re after a crisp easy to drink lager
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20 Linc (736) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - JUN 20, 2002
Nice hint of honey in the first taste but after that, it’s just a refreshing light drink, then again so is water. But this’ll get you drunk.
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 austinpowers (2827) - New York, New York, USA - JUN 19, 2002
Crisp and dry - reminiscent of a Japanese beer. I bought it just because I thought it’d be fun to drink a Tasmanian beer. An OK American Stardard.
3.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20 grant60 (185) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - JUN 8, 2002
the best australian beer seems to come from tasmania. boags tastes similar to cascade. i like the aroma.
4.6 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20 davidoz (9) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 31, 2002 does not count
I love tasmanian beers!! and BOAGS is the best of the best!
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 IslandHaole (1060) - Yokosuka-Shi, Kanagawa-Ken, JAPAN - MAY 3, 2002
Not much going on with this one. A typical run of the mill lager. A bit below average actually. Certainly not on my ’I need to try that one again’ list.
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20 leaparsons (6323) - Leicester, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - APR 29, 2002
Quite a sweet lager - not always a bad thing. I prefer the drier beers with an flavour that stays in the mouth for a while.
|