RateBeer
overall
9
81
style
Brewed by J. Boag & Son (San Miguel)
Style: Pale Lager
Launceston, Tasmania, Australia

bottled
common

on tap
unknown

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 491   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.35   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
A European style lager brewed from the finest quality pilsner malts. This beer is fermented at a lower temperature than most Australian lagers, and employs an extended maturation period. These combine together with a mixture of kettle and late hopping to yield a crisp pale lager


2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Papsoe (25074) - Frederiksberg, DENMARK - MAY 14, 2005
UPDATED: JUN 16, 2005 (Bottle 37,5 cl) Another beer that suddenly appeared in Denmark due to the royal wedding when everything tasmanian was talk of the town. Golden, creamy. High malt-sweetness and very subdued bitterness. Very mainstream pale lager. 150205

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
scotty (1078) - SCOTLAND - APR 9, 2005
Very pale straw, thin white head. Little aroma, perhaps slighlty grassy, but not much else really. Clean and fresh on the palate, light and fruity, very refreshing rahter than flavoursome. Ok lager but lacking much in the way of character,did Oddbins sell this many years ago in cans? I seem to remember it tasting much better then.

1.6
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
ALLOVATE (2547) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - FEB 19, 2005
Just read an article that interviewed brewers in Oz, who stated this to be their all time favourite Aussie beer. They must have been on drugs or otherwise paid royalties for the comments, because this was bland and boring as all hell! Poured from the bottle into a Pils glass, an island of diminishing foam sat atop a crystal clear straw body. No aroma, seemed they filtered that part out and flavour wise , this one left you scratching your head. Little ’candy’ sweetness, carbonic acid in front and down the sides, and a little citrus (if you look hard), made for a disappointing macro-soda affair of a beer. How can this be Australia’s best?!! Embarrassing.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
highlandlad (1434) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - FEB 15, 2005
Arguably the poorest of Australia’s line-up of over-priced ’premium lagers’. As with its rivals, Cascade and - especially - Crown, you pay over the odds to have any hint of character removed during the brewing process. It looks like 99% of other lagers and has an aroma that can be called "subtle" or "non-existent", depending on your bias. The palate is weak and watery. There is a faint hoppy bitterness and a little chalkiness in what passes for a finish. At least Cascade has some bitterness and a finish. (Bottle)

3.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
BatteredSosage (3) - Cairns, AUSTRALIA - FEB 12, 2005 does not count
not to bad , not to bad, not too bad, not too bad....doesnt compare to Boag’s Draught, i think they should swap labels

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
Stew41 (1793) - Woodend, AUSTRALIA - DEC 17, 2004
Geez this stuff is over-rated. Very much in the mainstream mold with a small amount of malt sweetness but not very bitter. Slightly strange flavour profile - a bit tight and citrussy - a bit like a weak flavoured sparkling white wine. The Strong Arm is miles better IMHO.

3.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
Mullo (102) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - OCT 4, 2004
UPDATED: JUN 11, 2005 bottle. Really impressed with the appearance because of the gassing. Gassing was in the form of streams of bubbles, which lasted the duration of the beer. I noted flavours of white wine, and pine, with a slight dryness on swallowing. Could have more depth for a premium.

3.2
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
johndoughty (4209) - cheslyn hay, West Midlands, ENGLAND - AUG 28, 2004
A quite crisp dry finish but nothing else to make it stand out from its many competitors. Unexciting-tried it once wont bother again.

2.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
jerohen (2061) - Bussum, NETHERLANDS - AUG 23, 2004
Typical pale lager of mediocre quality, what more can i possibly say? Ehmm, hoppy, malty, watery... Am i there yet? Just a few more characters... there you go!

2.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
caesar (5642) - Bunnik/Utrecht, NETHERLANDS - AUG 19, 2004
Clear yellow color, medium white head. Grainy aroma, some hops. Hoppy and grainy character.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 39 40 41  42  43 44 45 » 50


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50