RateBeer
overall
26
22
style
Brewed by Samlesbury (InBev UK)
Style: Bitter
Preston, England
Serve in English pint

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 2035   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.79   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Can: Pasteurised. Nitro widget.
Also sold as Boddington’s Gold and Boddington’s Export.
Stronger version of Boddington’s Bitter. First brewed in 1994 at 4.8%
Creamy head and a golden well balanced body.


1.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 4/20
bigmattiem (12) - Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 20, 2001
The flavor was weak, but overall it is not too bad, much better from the tap.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
Hoss (607) - Florida, USA - NOV 18, 2001
Just did nothting for me, thought it was a weak imitation

3.7
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
21iceman40 (1732) - Grafton, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 17, 2001
Good beer, gives head with the best. Solid taste. the yellow can really makes a statement. This is the only yellow can i can think of and that really makes a beer stand tall when its looks can stand alone.
Earlier Rating: 8/30/2001 Total Score: 3.2
I liked this one better than guiness draught. The flavor was better and it was more smooth.

2.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
jpm8920 (152) - Park Ridge, New Jersey, USA - NOV 13, 2001
great head because of the nitrogen ball, but a VERY weak flavor. it reminded me of cafferey’s ale, but way weaker.

1.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
shorlin (710) - St. John’s, Newfoundland, CANADA - NOV 7, 2001
This was from a draught-flow widget can. I can’t say it settled; more like it separated. A stagnant head sitting on top of an un-appealing looking beer. The taste was bland. The palate was a fake nitrogen induced creaminess.

3.4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
K-V-F-L (292) - LaVista, Nebraska, USA - OCT 16, 2001
Odd but not unpleasant subtlety. Nice first taste and firm, rocky head. Good job with the nitrogen capsule on this one. Not meant to be a really strong beer, I don’t think. Take it for what it is.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
bhenry76 (101) - Landenberg, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 16, 2001
Disappointment. Does not live up to hype.

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
legion242 (2303) - Richardson, Texas, USA - OCT 10, 2001
This beer probably deserves better ratings then it’s getting, but I am not the one to give them to it.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
hutch914199 (107) - Wisconsin, USA - OCT 9, 2001
Bland, watered down, not at all what I expected for the price.

2.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
motelpogo (7068) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - OCT 8, 2001
bitter in the most boring way. devoid of hoppiness


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 195 196 197  198  199 200 201 » 204


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50